Summary: In “From Homoerotics of Exile to Homopolitics of Diaspora,” Sima Shakhsari adequately argues that while cyberspace creates hypervisibility through mobilizations induced by Internet communication, it also provides political and entrepreneurial opportunities for Iranian diasporic queers.

Cyberspace provides visibility to the queer Iranian community, both within Iran and in the Iranian diaspora, while constructing a “perverted” identity of the West and an innocent identity of Iran within the Iranian exilic discourse. This reference to the West as being perverted is interesting because it places blame on the West for exposing Iranian queers to homosexuality, instead of accepting homosexuality as a natural identity. I was pleased at the fact that attitudes towards queer Iranians in exile shifted away from this discourse due to the introduction and expansion of cyberspace, which offers Iranian queers a safe, legitimate space to participate in dialogue and reach support from members abroad. However, I wonder how Iranian immigrants who do not have access to the internet are able to engage in conversation and receive information related to their identifiable community?

Also, similar to the ability of photographs to negotiate identity and produce images to promote acceptance, the internet possesses the power to do the same as a medium that has the capacity to reach a broad audience. I would assume that Internet blogs, videos, and articles are not as easy of targets to censorship as print media and publications. Is this true? If not, how are queer Iranians that are living in Iran able to interact with the queer diasporic Iranians? What are the censorship penalties (in Iran) of participating in internet conversation about queer identity?