“Looking” Behind and Beyond the Image of Black Masculinity

Thelma Golden brings together artists who challenge the fetishized and over-determined image of black masculinity.

Kobena Mercer highlights photographer Rotimi Fani-Kayode’s interest in the ecstatic possibilities of shattering identity.

Looking for Langston defies narrative and temporal conventions in a queer historiographic intervention.

History is “the smiler with the knife” in Looking for Langston. Violence is foregrounded as a powerful force in the construction of historical narratives as well in the very act of looking.  If we agree with Thelma Golden’s assertion that representation is central to power and that “the real struggle is over the power to control images,” then Looking for Langston can be seen as an intervention speaking truth to power.  The formal experimentation with narrative structure, the nonlinear montage of poetry with archival images, for example, and the use of multiple voices supports the radical intervention undertaken by the film.  Isaac Julien undertakes an intersectional exploration of race, gender performance and sexuality that, in terms of both content and form, is multifaceted and fluid.  As Golden and Mercer point out in their analyses of the images circulating of black masculinity and sexuality, these images overwhelmingly confine black male identity to the fixed, singular vision of white patriarchy. The film self-reflexively displays the processes by which images of black gay men are consumed while attempting to reclaim a space for black voices to queer the dominant narrative about the Harlem Renaissance.  In a sequence about midway through the film the possessive white gentleman from the club sequences walks past a series of projected images of black male nudes, touching the screen as he passes.  Thus this film, like the photographers who reacted to Mapplethorpe’s Black Males series, for example, explores the troubled dynamics of voyeuristic pleasure and fetishism that operate in the images circulating of black masculinities.

A Personal and Political Art History

Chicana artistic sensibilities are bordered.  They emerge in a borderland of ambiguity and flux. #anzaldua #latorre

#YolandaLopez also contributed images of La Virgen that affirmed the mulitplicity of #Chicana(@) identity

As an art historian I was most drawn to Latorre’s assertion that the language that contributes to the binary separation between artist and intellectual must be rejected in order to disrupt the subject/object binary that underlies it.  Art history that is committed to radical change must contribute to dismantling such structuring principles but must at the same time affirm cultural-historical specificities.  The opening up of art history to interdisciplinary and creative experimentation is crucial if we are to maintain its relevance to experiences beyond those privileged to accept the cannon without complaint. I think that art historical treatments of Chicana art represent a crucial case study in experimental approaches that destabilize monolinear narratives of art history while respecting the parameters of identity politics.  How personal is the political and how political is the art history?

How do we negotiate the need to maintain the specificity of Chicana identity when it is characterized by slips and fissures that generate multiple meanings and experiences across time?  I found it interesting that while Chicana artists working in the 1970s felt alienated by second wave feminism and sought to forge images that they could better relate to, it is possible that Latin@s of my generation might feel a break, in turn, from this tradition.  Recognizing that I am not Chican@ and that this certainly contributes to the distance I might feel from this artwork (and that I should not necessarily seek to identify with these images,) I do feel it is important to appreciate both the value and the limitations of these representational vocabularies.  These artists certainly contribute to the affirmation of Chicana identity against its erasure in male-dominated discourses of Chicanidad and Latinidad, yet I am interested in the limitations of this art in perpetuating symbolic economies that are no longer as relevant to Latin@s of my generation.  Unfortunately we face the paradox of contemporary art that embraces dispersion and flux to such a degree that the specific is no longer visible.  What kinds of images/performances/gestures/language exist in the space between roses and pomegranates and the white cube?

“Model Minorities” and the Construction of Color-Blindness

Elena Creef analyzes the wartime photography of Ansel Adams, Dorothea Lange and Toyo Miyatake to explore the discourses surrounding representations of Japanese Americans.  Both Creef and Wendy Kozol delve into the strategies by which images of the “model minority” were fashioned that stripped subjects of their specificity in an attempt to construct a sense of sameness and familiarity between “real” Americans and these racially suspect subjects.  This strategy coincided with the decline of scientific racism and the rise of “color-blindness,” forging an illusion of sameness across a multiplicity of racialized bodies under the notion that nation trumps ethnicity.  Thus the contradictory aims of Order 9066 to both alienate and assimilate Japanese-Americans was reconciled by photographic projects that momentarily separated out for scrutiny these subjects, only to reincorporate them and hide the evidence later.