The Portrayal of Various Forms of Masculinity

Golden: This reading explores the over interpreted representations and codifiable images of the Black male and Black masculinity in various forms of media that denies the truth of the black male identity.

Mercer: Kobena Mercer illustrates Rotimi Fani-Kayode’s use of erotic fantasy, ancestral spiritual values, and European elements to create cultural mixing and explains the influence that migration and separation from his Nigerian homeland had on his artistic production of photography.  

Looking for Langston: This black and white film portrays the collision of race and sexuality in the queer community.

This week’s film and readings explored the role that sexuality, gender, and race plays in reinforcing and reinventing the various types of Black masculinity, an identity that Ralph Ellison deems as “invisible and overinterpreted” in media. Considered as invisible in society, the Black male is fetishized and given visibility in art, films, and music.

Thelma Golden’s article was of particular interest to me because her exhibition serves as an umbrella to the Mercer article and the Langston film by portraying different stereotypes, cultural-defense mechanisms, and (mis)representations of the Black male as “ultra-violent [and] ultra-romanticized” (22). Golden’s project draws together artists that display the five signposts: 1) the transition from Civil Rights to the Black Power era; 2) blaxpoitation films; 3) the endangered Black male; 4) the death of rhythm and blues; and 5) real life drama. With the exception of the first signpost, the other categories signify the negative perceptions of the Black male and how they are used to create and circulate ill images of Black masculinity. Despite the artists’ attempt to negotiate identity and educate the audience of common racist assumptions, I am skeptical about the reception of outsiders, or non-Black audiences because instead of negating the negative generalizations, these images can reinforce and confirm them. With that being said, I would have liked to see positive images of Black men without the presence of stereotypes.

On a positive note, I do appreciate the diversity in the “Black Male” exhibit because it brings to light how Black culture is commodified through the portrayal of the Black experience both with and without the use of the body. For example, Mel Chin and David Hammons use objects, such as guns, sneakers, and the construction of basketball hoops to critique the commonly portrayed stereotypes of crime and sports within the Black community. Given the absence of the body in these pieces, the audience is still able to interpret the relationship between society’s ills and generalizations about Black masculinity. I wonder if the absence of the body in art offers a more critical critique of the pieces because the presence of the body can draw attention away from status detail, which is significant in identifying characteristics that are not as obvious.

Offering Alternatives

Golden: Discusses how the exhibition Black Male addressed aspects of invisibility and over-interpretation of black male body.

Mercer: Fani-Kayode’s photography explores the erotic as it relates to black masculinity by employing a ruptured disasporic spirituality and his own positionality as a queer man of African descent to make “interventions at the intersections”.

Julien: There was quite a bit going on in this film, but suffice to say Julien succeeded in queering the archive of the Harlem Renaissance not just with the abundant visual representation of queer black men, by also by neatly balancing representing black queen men as producers rather than as purely subjects and discussing the ways that queer black men can become subjects (i.e. the erotic tourism of white men to Harlem, employing the photos of Robert Mapplethorpe, etc).

All three texts that we were assigned today for class can really be brought together when we explore the bell hook’s quote that Golden presents us which says that the conversation of black male representation is not simply a question of critiquing the status quo, but about transforming the image, creating critical alternatives, and subverting what already exists. This is undoubtedly difficult to do especially because, as Golden points out, sometimes what we consider our “good” representations don’t necessarily offer us new locations and interventions, but stop at reactions to and critique of the stereotypical representations of the black male body created by white producers.  What is important about watching Looking for Langston and reading about Fani-Kayode (as well as being offered the various artists in Black Male) is that we are analyzing texts that are offering alternatives that can exist both as new forms for intellectual and cultural exploration and in this presentation up against the images that we have learned so well, they can also exist as critique. Especially evident in Looking for Langston, today’s texts emphasize the importance of being exposed to black producers creating new, interventionist black products. Being exposed to this next step seems especially important since Golden’s framework that she presents the exhibition in really emphasizes the necessity of having three elements present in analyzing the black male body (images that explore the physical and the psyche, images that transform what we are currently being offered in the mainstream, and images that represent true multiplicity).

Fighting against the ignorant social construction of Black Masuclinty

The challenges being both black and male present in American society are overwhelmingly disconcerting. In Looking for Langston the main character struggles with redefining for himself what it means to be a Black man. His college peers and the neighborhood young men have a hard time accepting his sexuality. X is meant to feel he is not ‘black” or “male” enough because his sexuality does not mirror the construction of Black male sexuality sustained by the ignorance of society and the media.
In the article “My Brother” Thelma Golden argues black masculinity is a social construct loaded with an abundance of unrealistic expectations and stereotypes. Golden argues the construct of black masculinity is a fantasy and so off balanced from the truth that no one could ever feel the void of the construction of Black masculinity. I agree with Golden’s argument and I think her argument is the source for why watching Brother to Brother was so painful for me. In the film, Perry is fighting a battle tremendously larger than he is capable of coping with and combating. Perry is fighting against a fantasy construction and loseing his true identity in the process. The hatred and indifference directed toward X from his friends, peers and strangers in actuality has nothing to do with who Perry is and everything to do with what society tells them Perry should be. My personal take away from the Golden reading and Brother to Brother is the acknowledgment and appreciation of all the various perspectives, personas, and sexualities, Black men have to offer.
The challenges being both black and male present in American society are overwhelmingly disconcerting. In Looking for Langston the main character struggles with redefining for himself what it means to be a Black man. His college peers and the neighborhood young men have a hard time accepting his sexuality. X is meant to feel he is not ‘black” or “male” enough because his sexuality does not mirror the construction of Black male sexuality sustained by the ignorance of society and the media.
In the article “My Brother” Thelma Golden argues black masculinity is a social construct loaded with an abundance of unrealistic expectations and stereotypes. Golden argues the construct of black masculinity is a fantasy and so off balanced from the truth that no one could ever feel the void of the construction of Black masculinity. I agree with Golden’s argument and I think her argument is the source for why watching Brother to Brother was so painful for me. In the film, Perry is fighting a battle tremendously larger than he is capable of coping with and combating. Perry is fighting against a fantasy construction and loseing his true identity in the process. The hatred and indifference directed toward X from his friends, peers and strangers in actuality has nothing to do with who Perry is and everything to do with what society tells them Perry should be. My personal take away from the Golden reading and Brother to Brother is the acknowledgment and appreciation of all the various perspectives, personas, and sexualities, Black men have to offer.
The challenges being both black and male present in American society are overwhelmingly disconcerting. In Looking for Langston the main character struggles with redefining for himself what it means to be a Black man. His college peers and the neighborhood young men have a hard time accepting his sexuality. X is meant to feel he is not ‘black” or “male” enough because his sexuality does not mirror the construction of Black male sexuality sustained by the ignorance of society and the media.
In the article “My Brother” Thelma Golden argues black masculinity is a social construct loaded with an abundance of unrealistic expectations and stereotypes. Golden argues the construct of black masculinity is a fantasy and so off balanced from the truth that no one could ever feel the void of the construction of Black masculinity. I agree with Golden’s argument and I think her argument is the source for why watching Brother to Brother was so painful for me. In the film, Perry is fighting a battle tremendously larger than he is capable of coping with and combating. Perry is fighting against a fantasy construction and loseing his true identity in the process. The hatred and indifference directed toward X from his friends, peers and strangers in actuality has nothing to do with who Perry is and everything to do with what society tells them Perry should be. My personal take away from the Golden reading and Brother to Brother is the acknowledgment and appreciation of all the various perspectives, personas, and sexualities, Black men have to offer.
The challenges being both black and male present in American society are overwhelmingly disconcerting. In Looking for Langston the main character struggles with redefining for himself what it means to be a Black man. His college peers and the neighborhood young men have a hard time accepting his sexuality. X is meant to feel he is not ‘black” or “male” enough because his sexuality does not mirror the construction of Black male sexuality sustained by the ignorance of society and the media.
In the article “My Brother” Thelma Golden argues black masculinity is a social construct loaded with an abundance of unrealistic expectations and stereotypes. Golden argues the construct of black masculinity is a fantasy and so off balanced from the truth that no one could ever feel the void of the construction of Black masculinity. I agree with Golden’s argument and I think her argument is the source for why watching Brother to Brother was so painful for me. In the film, Perry is fighting a battle tremendously larger than he is capable of coping with and combating. Perry is fighting against a fantasy construction and loseing his true identity in the process. The hatred and indifference directed toward X from his friends, peers and strangers in actuality has nothing to do with who Perry is and everything to do with what society tells them Perry should be. My personal take away from the Golden reading and Brother to Brother is the acknowledgment and appreciation of all the various perspectives, personas, and sexualities, Black men have to offer.
The challenges being both black and male present in American society are overwhelmingly disconcerting. In Looking for Langston the main character struggles with redefining for himself what it means to be a Black man. His college peers and the neighborhood young men have a hard time accepting his sexuality. X is meant to feel he is not ‘black” or “male” enough because his sexuality does not mirror the construction of Black male sexuality sustained by the ignorance of society and the media.
In the article “My Brother” Thelma Golden argues black masculinity is a social construct loaded with an abundance of unrealistic expectations and stereotypes. Golden argues the construct of black masculinity is a fantasy and so off balanced from the truth that no one could ever feel the void of the construction of Black masculinity. I agree with Golden’s argument and I think her argument is the source for why watching Brother to Brother was so painful for me. In the film, Perry is fighting a battle tremendously larger than he is capable of coping with and combating. Perry is fighting against a fantasy construction and loseing his true identity in the process. The hatred and indifference directed toward X from his friends, peers and strangers in actuality has nothing to do with who Perry is and everything to do with what society tells them Perry should be. My personal take away from the Golden reading and Brother to Brother is the acknowledgment and appreciation of all the various perspectives, personas, and sexualities, Black men have to offer.
The challenges being both black and male present in American society are overwhelmingly disconcerting. In Looking for Langston the main character struggles with redefining for himself what it means to be a Black man. His college peers and the neighborhood young men have a hard time accepting his sexuality. X is meant to feel he is not ‘black” or “male” enough because his sexuality does not mirror the construction of Black male sexuality sustained by the ignorance of society and the media.
In the article “My Brother” Thelma Golden argues black masculinity is a social construct loaded with an abundance of unrealistic expectations and stereotypes. Golden argues the construct of black masculinity is a fantasy and so off balanced from the truth that no one could ever feel the void of the construction of Black masculinity. I agree with Golden’s argument and I think her argument is the source for why watching Brother to Brother was so painful for me. In the film, Perry is fighting a battle tremendously larger than he is capable of coping with and combating. Perry is fighting against a fantasy construction and loseing his true identity in the process. The hatred and indifference directed toward X from his friends, peers and strangers in actuality has nothing to do with who Perry is and everything to do with what society tells them Perry should be. My personal take away from the Golden reading and Brother to Brother is the acknowledgment and appreciation of all the various perspectives, personas, and sexualities, Black men have to offer.

Black Male Body

Originally aired on the highly successful British series Out on Tuesday, a weekly lesbian and gay news show appearing on commercial television, Looking for Langston weaves the poetry of Langston Hughes and contemporary black gay poet Essex Hemphill with pieces of Bruce Nugent’s Harlem Renaissance short story ‘Smoke, Lilies, and Jade’ to effect what director Issac Julien has described as a ‘relational shift between the past and the present’.

 The film’s discontinuous non-linear visual style is a montage of archival footage of the Harlem Renaissance, Hughes reciting poetry to a jazz accompaniment, and contemporary imagery including a focus on the photography of Mapplethrope. The non-linear narrative is particularly striking and demonstrates the relational shift between the past and the present. This artistic choice authorizes a rethinking of the question of the relationship between the present and historical representation.

 Looking for Langston challenges its viewers to investigate racial histories that are intricately and antagonistically intertwined with histories of (homo)sexuality. These challenges demand accounts differential places within the historical development of racism, racial stratification and racialized cultural.

(In)visibility of black masculine identities

Link

Golden: How have contemporary black artists navigated the constructions of black masculine identities in the quest for authenticity?

Julien: Isaac Julien’s “Looking for Langston” embodies the search for a sense of “place” for the black gay male in a heterosexist and racist world.

Mercer: Rotimi Fani-Kayode, a photographer by trade, uses the black male body in his work as the incarnation of an entre-deux, a living intersection.

After reading the first few sentences of Thelma Golden’s piece “My Brother”, I immediately thought of an exhibition I saw in DC of Hank Willis Thomas’s work, an artist we’ve encountered before in this course. In the series “Branded”, Thomas explicitly confronts contemporary black masculinity and its construction by (white) America. The piece that most struck me from this collection, Branded Head, is a lightjet print from 2003 (pictured below).

Branded Head 2003

 

Also in this series is the equally stunning (and discomfiting) Basketball and Chain, another lightjet print from the same year.

Basketball and Chain 2003

 

Both images, which can be found at Thomas’s site under “2011 – Branded”, speak to the continued white ownership, in some sense, of black masculinity. Here, Thomas uses the example of professional basketball and Nike’s (here, literal) branding tactics to make apparent the trap of contemporary black masculinity, which according to the artist seems to be a modern reconstruction of slavery. Ownership, of one’s own body and of masculinity and representation, is especially pertinent here and in the works of the other artists named by Golden, as they seek to navigate the loaded subject of the black male. These artists must, in a sense, unshackle the black masculine in order to find a liberating authenticity.

In the same vein, I’d like to challenge Golden’s claim that “hip-hop culture has become the signifier of black male heterosexuality”. Golden is right to claim that hip-hop/rap have become sites of the demonstration of “fitness” as a (heterosexual!) black male, but I do not think that this territory is so flat. Not only do queer black rappers/hip-hop artists exist, but does the overwhelmingly heterosexual music of the mainstream necessarily conform to heterosexual ideals? I think this is a claim that can be played with and disproved, especially with an examination of “acceptable” white (hetero)sexuality and the “other” sexuality. In the meantime, I’d love to share some up-and-coming queer rappers with my classmates and followers of the blog. Please recall, however, that while these artists are in a way “pioneers”, as the article claims, they are in no way the ONLY queer hip-hop artists/rappers and they are certainly not the first ones. Just thought this would be an interesting read with regards to the overwhelming heterosexism inherent to constructions of black masculinity and gender!

Rotimi Fani-Kayode

Kobena Mercer’s assertions that Rotimi Fani-Kayode “created a photographic world in which the body is the focal site for an exploration of the relationship between erotic fantasy and ancestral spiritual values”(283) and that in his work it is “hard to tell where sexuality begins and spirituality ends”(283) served as guides to me when looking at the work of Fani-Kayode. Fani-Kayode was not interested in finding or expressing one simplified identity but instead created a complex and multifaceted view representative of his gay, African, multi-national, spiritual identity. Thus it is important to consider all of these biographical and personal elements as one when viewing Kayode’s work and stop trying to fragment and dissect the images in terms of their influences. To try to identify any divides or boundaries between the sexual and the spiritual would rob the images of much of their weight and power. Fani-Kayode’s multi-faceted explorations are all located in the image of the black male body. The body “becomes a site for translation and metaphor”(Mercer 284) bridging the divide between differences in race, culture, and sexuality. One way that Fani-Kayode situates the body as the intersection of material and spiritual worlds is through the use of African masks. In his 1987 photograph Ebo Orisa the unclothed artist bends over towards the viewer obstructing his face so that only the back of his head shows as he holds a wooden African mask upside down below his head. Firstly, I find this photograph to be very striking in its formal elements. The posture of the subject and the inversion of the mask transform the figure into an otherworldly creature. Mercer argues that Fani-Kayode’s images like Ebo Orisa are the result of the play of condensation and displacement (288).

Rotimi Fani-Kayode The Golden Phallus, 1989

Rotimi Fani-Kayode The Golden Phallus, 1989

I feel that Fani-Kayode’s 1989 image The Golden Phallus is a wonderful example of the artist’s intertwining of the spiritual and the sexual through the use of the body and elements from his native culture. The image approaches the idea of the fetishized and mythologized black phallus using Yoruba mythology. The artist wears a bird-like mask that recalls the ororo bird of thought an inspiration present in Yoruba myths but the image also invokes the Yoruba god of indeterminacy. Fani-Kayode describes Esu as “The Trickster” and “Lord of the Crossroads” and underscores his importance in Yoruba carnival. The image is both theatrical and supernatural which foregrounds the bridging of man and spirit. The image also foregrounds the subject’s sexuality while critiquing fetishization instead of fetishizing.

“Looking” Behind and Beyond the Image of Black Masculinity

Thelma Golden brings together artists who challenge the fetishized and over-determined image of black masculinity.

Kobena Mercer highlights photographer Rotimi Fani-Kayode’s interest in the ecstatic possibilities of shattering identity.

Looking for Langston defies narrative and temporal conventions in a queer historiographic intervention.

History is “the smiler with the knife” in Looking for Langston. Violence is foregrounded as a powerful force in the construction of historical narratives as well in the very act of looking.  If we agree with Thelma Golden’s assertion that representation is central to power and that “the real struggle is over the power to control images,” then Looking for Langston can be seen as an intervention speaking truth to power.  The formal experimentation with narrative structure, the nonlinear montage of poetry with archival images, for example, and the use of multiple voices supports the radical intervention undertaken by the film.  Isaac Julien undertakes an intersectional exploration of race, gender performance and sexuality that, in terms of both content and form, is multifaceted and fluid.  As Golden and Mercer point out in their analyses of the images circulating of black masculinity and sexuality, these images overwhelmingly confine black male identity to the fixed, singular vision of white patriarchy. The film self-reflexively displays the processes by which images of black gay men are consumed while attempting to reclaim a space for black voices to queer the dominant narrative about the Harlem Renaissance.  In a sequence about midway through the film the possessive white gentleman from the club sequences walks past a series of projected images of black male nudes, touching the screen as he passes.  Thus this film, like the photographers who reacted to Mapplethorpe’s Black Males series, for example, explores the troubled dynamics of voyeuristic pleasure and fetishism that operate in the images circulating of black masculinities.

The Fight for the Black Male Body

Looking for Langston depicts the “hidden” gay black male identity during the Harlem Renaissance as a verbal & visual aesthetic black and white film.

Mercer: Fani-Kayode confronts the hybridity of his identity in depicting black masculinity and gay culture.

Golden describes the use of stereotypes in art to represent the ignored diversity in black male culture.

In the essay, “My Brother”, Thelma Golden depicts the high desire to use the black male body as a canvas. In the past, western artists fetishize the body with stereotypes of savagery, overt sexuality, and defiance. Now, contemporary black artists, left to reconstruct and decolonize the body, appropriate stereotypes and various mediums in an attempt to reclaim the black male body. The canvas continues to fascinate media as pop culture consumes the black male body for its fame and infamy in sex, crimes, and sports. These multiple uses of the canvas represent a fight and struggle over the body’s representation. The contradiction that this contest produces is undeniable: the black male body is invisible yet overrepresented, an endangered presence yet a historic icon, demonized yet overinterpreted. Kobena Mercer explains it best when he describes the body as a site of “social identity in crisis” and “ideological representation.” The debate over the representation of the black male body exemplifies the crisis of the canvas.

The debate sparked by the negative imagery of the black male body, which overshadows the positive imagery, continues as the negative images are thought to represent black masculine culture. Golden emphasizes that this misinterpretation is false, as black masculinity, like other cultures, cannot be defined by stereotypes. There is “no single way to represent the black male.” Since black masculinity exists as an identity of otherness, the debate over representation and the authors of the imagery will continue to exist. Despite the privilege of masculinity, black males still face the social construct of their blackness, which defines their otherness. Jeff Koons, a Caucasian American, produced the work below, Moses. It notes the success of black men in sports, representing Moses Malone, a professional basketball player. But the contradiction of the name Moses, a hero from the Bible, and the hell-like background plays on the double consciousness of the black male, one with the privilege of masculinity yet the burden of blackness. The artist’s identity and the image’s contradiction set an example of causes for the continued debate over the image of black masculinity.

Moses by Jeff Koons, 1985

Moses by Jeff Koons, 1985

 

Black Male Body

Within the Davis Museum’s own collection, I find Rashid Johnson and Hank Willis Thomas’s photograph entitled “Portrait of Two American Artists as Young Negro Scholars” (digital chromogenic print; 2008) to be visually and formally striking, in addition to presenting a reconsideration of stereotypical representations of black men.

Portrait of Two American Artists as Young Negro Scholars, Rashid Johnson and Hank Willis Thomas, 2008

Portrait of Two American Artists as Young Negro Scholars, Rashid Johnson and Hank Willis Thomas, 2008

As noted by Thelma Golden, mainstream images of black men typically fall into three predictable paradigms: “sex, crime and sports.” (Golden, 27) However, this works falls outside this standard prescription of the black male form. In viewing the photograph, I perpetually wonder what it accomplishes and I often return to Golden’s question of black masculinity representing a contradiction in terms. (Golden, 19) While the author uses this question to posit whether black masculinity is inherently contradictory, I wonder what contradictions this photograph presents to the stereotypical representations of black men. They are not sexualized, athletes or criminals; they therefore work against the simplified depictions of black bodies and present themselves in a distinctly different fashion (intentionally, I would argue, based upon the title) as scholars. In Golden’s red-black-green theoretical color scheme, this image occupies the red, not only challenging rampant negative stereotypes, but also proving that “there is no one black masculinity.” (Golden, 25) In stark contrast, as discussed by Leigh Raiford’s Imprisoned in a Luminous Glare, the eponymous image of Huey Newton seated in a wicker chair, gun in hand, served as a political and tactical tool for the Black Panther Party. Undoubtedly, photography served as a deeply intentional medium for the widespread dissemination of the image that came to be synonymous with the political prowess of the BPP. As noted by Kobena Mercer, the black male body is inscribed with ideological representations and serves as “a site upon which the nation’s crisis comes to be dramatized, demonized, and dealt with.” (As quoted within Golden, 19) While this image served as a political tool for the BPP, it also embodied the fears of the American media and many politicians, who framed the BPP as militant and hypermasculine. The image puts both the BPP and black masculinity under a veil of violence and therefore plays to Golden’s argument that “media fascination” telescopes its attention to representations of black men as threatening. (Golden, 27)

Throughout both the Black Male Whitney exhibition catalogue and within Looking for Langston, references to Robert Mapplethorpe perpetually raise the question of the subjecthood the men he photographs. Mapplethorpe’s Black Book (1986) relentlessly sexualizes the male body in formally stunning photographs that coalesce within his “world of splendor and sexual enthrallment.” (Golden, 33) The photographs—debated, denounced and often censored—are incredibly beautiful representations of the nude male form that have largely been countered as racialized and problematic. While Golden argues that “the controversy they provoked… speaks volumes about the fear of black masculinity,” his fascination with the male form presents decontextualized bodies who, by and large, lack subjecthood. (Golden, 33) Mapplethorpe’s approach speaks directly to the sexualization of the black body (and, in many ways, perpetuates this sexualization) while also attempting to “detach compulsive heterosexuality from black masculinity.” (Golden, 33) I would be curious to gauge class perception about whether these images are exploitative or progressive because while they strip men of their subjecthood (and their clothes), they also debunk the hegemonic heterosexuality of representations of black masculinity.

Black Male Sexuality

Golden: This piece challenges the very vision of black men in contemporary media and art; the contradictory beliefs and opinions of black males fail to address their complexities and their role as a scapegoat in society.

Mercer- Fani Kayode’s work addresses the identity politics that confronts most artists that belong to traditional oppressed groups; He expands on the complexities by expressing other factors of marginalization for black men, not belonging in regards to sexuality, upbringing, and his navigation of the art world.

Looking for Langston- The film provides an in-depth look at the struggle ; however the film is unique in the absence of a direct narrative.

Golden- The exhibit has an interesting view of the struggle of complete humanity for black males in America. Black men are the scapegoats of society; simultaneously pitied and hated, which reflects the insecurities of whites more than the reality of black men’s identity. The representations of black men in art/media have been presented and mainly consumed by white audiences, who are invested in the fetishization of their identity. This fetishization became commercialized through film & art, notably with the popularity of blaxploitation films like Sweetback. These films provided an opportunity to present an exaggerated form of black culture, which was appreciated and consumed by black and white audiences. Other events have contributed to the images of black men in contemporary art. The era of Black Power & the ascendance of hip-hop tell the story of the struggle of black males, mainly from poverty-stricken areas, and their ability to defy the norm of white American culture. These events contribute to the exaggerated image of black males; however they each were initiatives in respond to the oppressive nature of American culture.