The Museum Highlights selections really opened my eyes to the art world and its boundaries. Many people, myself included, fail to realize how divisive the arts have become at the hand of professionalism and academia. This is extremely important to note and I believe that groups like Kontext Kunst and artists like Andrea Fraser that dedicate themselves to bridging the gaps between writing, thinking, and making presented in the art world are admirable. Fraser is able to do this through the interconnectedness of her writing, and performances.
One thing that stood out to me about Frasers project art is the way in which it critiques aspects of the culture of art oftentimes simply through representation. Understanding these cultural tendencies is something that I came to learn through Fraser’s work. For example, while reading chapter 9 of a performance where Jane Castleton leads a tour group through the Philadelphia Museum of Art, it became undoubtedly apparent to me who and what the Museum deemed important, as well as what type of people the Museum preferred and catered to. Fraser sums up this notion beautifully in her description of Jane in the end notes where she states:
“as a volunteer, she expresses the possession of a quantity of the leisure and the economic and cultural capital that defines a museum’s patron class. It is only a small quantity – indicating rather than bridging the class gap that compels her to volunteer her services in the absence of capital…yet it is enough to position her in identification with the museum’s board of trustees and as the museum’s exemplary viewer” (Fraser, 110)
Fraser: Through the interconnectedness of her writing and performances, Fraser attempts to bridge the division between ‘writing’, ‘thinking’, and ‘making’ that the professionalization of the artist and intellectual created.
Taylor: Taylor outlines the history of performance art and highlights artists significant to the genre including Abramovic, and Scheemann.