Tag Archives: Iranian diaspora

The Others: the Colonized and the Iranian Queers

Posted on by
Reply

Summaries:
“From Homoerotics of Exile to Homopolitics of Diaspora by Sima Shakhsari”: The Internet and the post war on terror environment foster an intellectual environment for the digital presence of Iranian queers.
Contemporary Art by Taylor: Colonization led to artistic appropriation of “subordinate” cultures and enforced the “other” identities

Blog:
In Contemporary Art, Taylor explores various identities of otherness affected by colonialism and historical appropriation. The identity crisis of these individuals contrasts with the “other” experience of queers from the Iranian diaspora as explained in Sima Shaksari’s “From Homoerotics of Exile to Homopolitics of Diaspora by Sima Shakhsari.” The Iranian diaspora belongs to a country which lacks a history of colonialism and is affected by its national identity rather than historical appropriation. In the motherland, the national identity promotes a heterosexual narrative and persecutes those who identify as homosexuals. Hence, Iranian queers exist as the “other” of their accepted national identity. Like the identities affected by colonialism, queers of the Iranian diaspora are affected by the West. On a visit to Columbia University in September 2007, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad stated in response to a question about execution of Iranian homosexuals that “[I]n Iran we don’t have homosexuals like in your country.” He expressed a common belief in Iran that homosexuality is associated with Western culture. This is perpetuated by a history of conflict with the United States and the West. Recent sanctions and declarations, including Bush’s labeling of Iran as an “axis of evil” in 2002, against the country worsen the relationship of Iran with the West and the relationship of Iran with its queers.
Taylor explains how the “others” affected by colonialism purposely use appropriation to express their identities. Whereas Iranian queers, as stated by Shaksari, are conveying their narrative via outlets of the Internet, such as blogs and online magazines. Iranian gay activists and bloggers, such as Arsham Parsi, utilize cyberspace as a haven to articulate perspective, network with other queers, and depict visibility. Although examples of Parsi mark great strides, online homophobic hate speech claiming a purpose of freedom counteracts the progress. Also, a need for diverse voices exists in online Iranian queer forums. Like identities affected by colonialism, Iranian queers still face obstacles in defending their rights in their claimed forms of expression.

Que(e)rying Queer Discourse

Posted on by
Reply

Taylor: Contemporary artists outside of the West have used a variety of media to grapple with the oppressions they face in a post-colonial context.

Shakhsari: Despite the fact that the new inclusion and the visibility of the Iranian queer in cyberspace is positive, one must be extremely wary of the nature of this “acceptance” and critique the hegemonic and homonationalist discourses to which this “tolerance” adheres.

Shakhsari deftly tackles the subject of the Iranian queer, suddenly made hypervisible through the powers of cyberspace. Naturally, queer visibility and a move towards the acceptance and even celebration of queer people is a positive thing… But is it so thoroughly positive? Much of the Iranian diaspora, it seems, embraces a pseudo-inclusive mind-set, a bizarre sort of homophobic non-homophobia that seems all too familiar for queers anywhere. It’s the sort of irritating “I’m fine with gays, as long as they don’t hit on me” mentality, the “not in my backyard” thinking that feigns acceptance and really only whitewashes the homophobia just beneath the surface. Queerness, like “diaspora”, has become chic in the blogosphere, a trendy way of positioning yourself against the Iranian state, now with queers added! More disturbing than this “add queers and stir” method that Shakhsari identifies, in my mind, is the homonationalist discourse that dominates the queer Iranian blogosphere. While queer activists like Parsi are instrumental and have certainly done a lot for gay and lesbian Iranians, they have also left many of their queer siblings behind. When queer became chic, only the homonormative became chic, only certain Iranian queers were deemed “representable subjects” in this strategic inclusion. Much like the queer community in a national or even international perspective, it is the most privileged or most “normative” members of the community who are made visible, who are accepted, who are given agency. As Fraser has shown us (us here being ARTH/AFR 316, of course!), we must critique even the structures that give us (limited) power, we occasionally have to bite the proverbial hand that feeds if we wish to seek more satisfying sustenance later on. Shakhsari understands this, and chooses not to comply with homonormative and homonationalist discourses, instead remaining skeptical and attempting to queer the dominant queer discourse in a quest for an even better future.

Visibility through Cyberspace

Posted on by
Reply

Summary: In “From Homoerotics of Exile to Homopolitics of Diaspora,” Sima Shakhsari adequately argues that while cyberspace creates hypervisibility through mobilizations induced by Internet communication, it also provides political and entrepreneurial opportunities for Iranian diasporic queers.

Cyberspace provides visibility to the queer Iranian community, both within Iran and in the Iranian diaspora, while constructing a “perverted” identity of the West and an innocent identity of Iran within the Iranian exilic discourse. This reference to the West as being perverted is interesting because it places blame on the West for exposing Iranian queers to homosexuality, instead of accepting homosexuality as a natural identity. I was pleased at the fact that attitudes towards queer Iranians in exile shifted away from this discourse due to the introduction and expansion of cyberspace, which offers Iranian queers a safe, legitimate space to participate in dialogue and reach support from members abroad. However, I wonder how Iranian immigrants who do not have access to the internet are able to engage in conversation and receive information related to their identifiable community?

Also, similar to the ability of photographs to negotiate identity and produce images to promote acceptance, the internet possesses the power to do the same as a medium that has the capacity to reach a broad audience. I would assume that Internet blogs, videos, and articles are not as easy of targets to censorship as print media and publications. Is this true? If not, how are queer Iranians that are living in Iran able to interact with the queer diasporic Iranians? What are the censorship penalties (in Iran) of participating in internet conversation about queer identity?