Carbohydrates in Orgo

During our last few weeks in orgo II with Professor Carrico-Moniz, we studied carbohydrates. It was super cool to hear them taught in a somewhat different perspective than how we approached them in biochem this semester. I appreciated that I already knew the various configurations and conformations of the carbohydrates, but also that had the additional knowledge of how these structures affected their functions and behavior. Someone asked why the 1,6 glucose linkages in amylopectin were necessary if amylose already had 1,4 glucose linkages, and it was something that organic chemistry alone could not describe. After taking biochem, I was able to say that the additional 1,6 linkages in amylopectin are able to help store glucose in our cells more efficiently to be used for energy in our bodies. Thanks biochem!

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Fat and the Brain

Recently, we’ve talked about good cholesterol and bad cholesterol, and associated them with HDLs and LDLs, respectively. As a reminder, HDLs collect cholesterol from the arteries and transport them back to the liver to be degraded and reused, while LDLs distribute the cholesterol/fat from the liver to the rest of the body. However, why do we need LDLs if they’re associated with bad cholesterol? LDLs are really only bad when they largely outnumber the HDL level in the body, but besides that its very useful for us to transport fat around our bodies. Lately one of my friends was hospitalized for his lack of fine motor control and decreased ability to control his reflexes. The doctors eventually found that the axon sheathes covering the axons in his brain were either thinning or had developed thinner than they should have and therefore his neurons were firing inappropriately. They also found that he was eating a lot of butter and creamer while he was in the hospital. Interestingly, it turns out that the myelin sheathes covering our axons are directly affected by how much fat we intake. This is a reason that its good to eat fat! Especially during early development. We need myelination in our brains in order for our neurons to fire properly and so that we can function properly.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Water’s effect on skin

Our skin is able to maintain itself even after hours of soaking in warm/cold water. Cells begin to swell as they soak up water and our outermost layer of skin doubles or even triples in size, causing our skin to wrinkle. However as we become older, our skin becomes thinner. Even though the outer layer of skin can still swell, there is less swelling and therefore produces less wrinkles.

The main reason skin gets wrinkly instead of dissolving is due to the structure of keratin in the outer layer of skin cells. The keratin filaments in these outermost are arranged in a net-like pattern. This outer layer is still anchored to the layer of skin beneath it, which does not absorb any water.

 

So you can thank keratin filaments for making sure we remain intact and don’t dissolve like the wicked witch west!

Posted in Week 11 | Leave a comment

Fatty Acids & Blood Pressure

A Mediterranean diet is known to combat high blood pressure and  researchers have linked unsaturated fats, nitrite and nitrate to a reduced blood pressure in rodents. A typical Mediterranean diet consists of olive oil, plant-based foods, paired with fish or chicken.

The investigation examined the process by which unsaturated fat combine with nitrite and nitrate to form nitro fatty acids. It showed that these nitro fatty acids inhibit the activity of an enzyme called soluble Epoxide Hydrolase (sEH), which then leads to the reduction of blood pressure.

When mice were fed unsaturated fats and food rich in nitrite and nitrate, the enzyme was inhibited in the mice and they showed reduced signs of blood pressure. This study can then help develop future medication that can mimic these results in humans.

This is personally interesting given the fact that I know many people affected by high blood pressure. It gives me bright hopes and aspirations for the future of medicine and biochemistry.

 

Posted in Week 10 | 1 Comment

The Marketing of Science

The word ‘chemical’ has been recently subjected to negative connotations, especially in the food industry. There have been major efforts in food preservation to advance such chemical knowledge and it is certainly frightening for people to think that anything unnatural be consumed, anything that has ‘chemicals’ in it.

But the truth is that chemicals are everywhere and are in everything. They take part in everyday biological systems. Part of the reason the term chemical has adapted a negative connotation, in my opinion, is largely due to the marketing industry. It is very easy to adopt slogans that would deter people from purchasing anything that contains synthetic materials. This in turn brings in huge revenue for the chemical-free/organic industry.

Now while I agree that organic materials are healthier for human consumption, I believe that the term ‘chemical’ which is closely related to ‘chemistry’ has brought many negative overtones for the field.

Here is an article talking more about the subject:http://www.theguardian.com/science/blog/2014/may/19/manmade-natural-tasty-toxic-chemicals

Posted in Week 9 | Leave a comment

Gender Bias in Science

It has been recently brought to my attention that for a long time biological experiments that tested on rat specimens could be biased. A main argument that has been argued for using mainly male specimens is that the female hormone cycle might be disturbed and therefore might impact results. Yet, it has recently been argued by the University of Wisconsin-Madison that male hormones are no more likely to distortionary than female cycles, meaning that is just as likely for the male specimen to impact results. In an effort to prove this theory, the NIH has granted the Wisconsin-Madison a grant to conduct research.

This made me think about the gender bias that exists in science and question current methodology, since I agree that both sexes should be equally represented in our understanding of biological systems.

Posted in Week 8 | Leave a comment

Thinking about trans fats….

Trans vs Cis Fatty Acids (Source: Wikipedia)

This is a fairly short post, but it’s just been on my mind: what makes a trans-fat bad? We talked about this in class, but I found the visualization helpful. From this image, we can see that trans fats (e.g., margarine) are more rigid and unnatural for humans with our flexible cells, while cis fats (e.g., butter) have that flowing, bent, and less compatible fatty tail. I’ve always heard that fats that melt or soften at room temperature are the healthiest of fats, wheres those that don’t, like solid vegetable oil (e.g., Crisco), are unnatural and unhealthy in larger doses. I think our discussion in class about flowing cells really helps us to understand why! Now, you too can be the cool guest at all your next parties talking about why trans fat is out, and butter is in!

 

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Overweight and Nutrient Deficient?

If we aren’t already, new research suggests we definitely will be by 2050. For some biochemical reason (which is still eluding scientists), heightened levels of CO2 in the atmosphere is significantly reducing zinc, iron and protein content in wheat and rice — by as much as 10% in the next 35 years. Soybeans and peas also seem to have reduced zinc and iron content. Since zinc and iron shortages in particular are already taking tens of millions of lives each year, and the world currently depends on these plants for ~70% of our nutritional content, these global climate change effects may be the worst yet on record. Increasing our carbohydrate intake to compensate for the nutrient loss would just add to our problems by making us obese.

Scientists are looking into the mechanism of the nutritional degradation process, so far to no conclusion, but we have other alternatives:

As discussed in foodie Jo Robinson’s book, Eating on the Wild Side, our staple foods have already had innumerable nutrients bred out of them — in favor of efficient packaging and storage. Apparently, modern Americans eat 7.5 billion pounds of fries annually (~30 lbs./person/year). I’m not surprised, since the first meal I saw after starting this post included some (picture below)! But, historically, Native Americans ate healthier varieties of potato, including the apio (potato pea). As it turns out, the apio has 3x the amount of protein of modern potatoes, as well as genistein — that beloved, cancer risk-lowering nutrient found in soybeans. Apios also lower blood pressure, go figure! So what’s the catch? Apios can take 3 years to grow to the size of modern potatoes, and even then their irregular. So much for the nutritional benefit! We’ve thrown apios away with as many as 5,000 other varieties of wild potato. But as nutrients become more precious, perhaps we’ll learn a lesson or two from the slow foods movement. I, for one, hope to garden my own apios. Green thumbs up from me!

20140314_123930

BBC article: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-27308720

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Dorothy Hodgkin: X-Ray Crystallography

The other day, I noticed that the Google homepage was well decorated with some sort of biomolecule. But upon closer inspection, once can note the faint diffraction signals outlined by small  figures behind the elements of the molecule. Once I realized this, I knew that Google was honoring x-ray crystallography.


Screen Shot 2014-05-18 at 11.15.13 PM

 

However, I did not realize that Dorothy Hodgkin was a pioneer of the field of X-ray crystallography. The technique was founded about 100 years ago and it revolutionized our understanding of the molecular the structure. She was only the third woman to be awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry for her discovery of the structure of vitamin B12 in 1964. She was also know for her contribution to the discovery of the structure of insulin and penicillin.

So there you have it! Women are pioneering biochemistry and paving the way for those to come!

 

Posted in Uncategorized, Week 7 | Leave a comment

“Heel No Pain”?

I recently read an article that promised high heel wearers freedom from the everlasting pain associated with their favorite shoe. A product, taking form of a liquid spray, called Heel No Pain by a company called Biochemistry sets out to reduce the pain that comes with wearing a stiletto-high shoe. The product claims that upon spraying the product to the balls and heels of the feet, the wearer would feel instant relief within 15-20 minutes. I, of course, was immediately skeptical about these claims so I looked more about heel pain and pain in general.

I found that stimuli that cause pain are regulated by nociceptors and converted into nerve impulses in the brain. Nociceptors detect potentially harmful situations in their surrounding tissues. They are located throughout the body in the skin, internal organs, joints, muscles and tendons. Nociceptors fire signals through an ascending pathway to the brain when damage is detected, sending pain signals to the spinal cord and the brain. A reaction is then observed via signaling through the descending pathway.

In observing the pain caused by wearing high heels it is not so much the pain felt from the skin, where the product directly makes contact, as the pain felt from the bones of the feet. When wearing high-heeled shoes, the body adapts an unusual conformation and then puts more strain on the joints of the feet. Although I don’t personally believe this spray can do much to cure the pain caused by high-heels, biochemistry is certainly on its way.

Posted in Uncategorized, Week 3 | Leave a comment