On the “New Woman” of the Modernist Era

From Marianne DeKoven, “Modernism and Gender”:

Shifts in gender relations at the turn of the century were a key factor in the emergence of Modernism. The period from 1880 to 1920, within which Modernism emerged and rose to preeminence as the dominant art form in the West (it remained dominant until the end of World War II), was also the heyday of the first wave of feminism, consolidated in the woman suffrage movement. The protagonist of this movement was known as the “New Woman”: independent, educated, (relatively) sexually liberated, oriented more toward productive life in the public sphere than toward reproductive life in the home.

The New Woman was dedicated, as Virginia Woolf passionately explained in “Professions for Women,” to the murder of the “Angel of the House,” the notorious poetic idealization of Victorian nurturant-domestic femininity. This New Woman inspired a great deal of ambivalent modernist characterization, from Hardy’s Sue Bridehead and Ibsen’s Hedda Gabler to Chopin’s Edna Pontellier and Woolf’s Lily Briscoe. (174)

Rebecca West’s The Return of the Soldier (1918) is an interesting text to read alongside the notion of the New Woman.

How so?

Excerpts from Lt. Col. Charles Myers, MD, “Contributions to the Study of Shell Shock” (1916)

(Part IV.)The Lancet. 9 Sept. 1916. 461–467.

“The usual direct result of the shock [from a shell or bomb explosion] is ‘loss of consciousness’ or ‘loss of memory’ ” (461).

“Such disorders … are not immediately attributable to violence, gas poisoning, or other physical causes. They are the result of a functional inhibition, which is usually traceable to intense fear or horror, but which may … occasionally arise in circumstances where consciousness has been so instantaneously lost that the emotional effects of the shock have not been actually experienced by the patient” (466).

Footage from the First World War

Watch a few minutes from a couple of these if you can:

 

This one is on Shell Shock: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=faM42KMeB5Q

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2QRftl3vFZ4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2QRftl3vFZ4https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yWJB6Y-3N5o

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3bggGLzk6cQ&list=PL20941FE5572F0C17&index=6

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hgkxezEvI2I

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ck6wACEENIw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CxOrzgd3xWI&index=5&list=PL20941FE5572F0C17 

Confinement (blog post by Chandler)

In the last chapters of The House of Mirth, Lily experiences a new kind of containment in the working class that parallels restriction under society’s customs, but also contrasts sharply with Lily’s conscious subjection to restraint within society. The narrator utilizes the metaphor of a “great gilt cage” to depict the abstract sense of confinement created by the set of restrictions and customs of high society (Wharton 54). Though Lily resents the restrictions placed on her in society, she consciously chooses to remain a part of society and hold onto many of the material values and aspirations of society.

On the other hand, the world of the working classes into which Lily must enter reflects a more concrete type of containment, from which it is nearly impossible for Lily to escape. The descriptions of the physical spaces Lily inhabits in this world reflect this more concrete confinement from which Lily cannot raise herself. For instance, once she is forced to earn her own living, Lily’s life plays out in a series of cell-like, enclosed spaces such as the millinery workroom (Wharton 277) and Lily’s dingy room in the boardinghouse (Wharton 282). Additionally, the structure of the paragraph in which Lily encounters Miss Silverton parallels Lily’s movement from the expansive and fashionable avenues of New York into the small, confining spaces of the world in which she must now live: “this glimpse of the ever-revolving wheels of the great social machine made Lily more than ever conscious of the steepness and narrowness of Gerty’s stairs, and of the cramped blind-alley of life to which they led. Dull stairs destined to be mounted by dull people” (Wharton 258). The physical descriptions of spaces in the last chapters of this novel reflect this concrete stagnation and repression that sharply contrasts with the relative liberty found within the more abstract “great gilt cage” (Wharton 54). Lily feels confined and restrained in both society and in the working class; however, there is a key difference in her conscious choice to remain in society despite this resentment of her repression and the impossibility of her escape from the poverty in which she finds herself at the end of the novel.