Oysters are an Ecologist’s Best Friend

“Watch your step.”

On a brisk November morning, I found myself at Savin Hill Cove, where the Neponset River meets the Atlantic Ocean just south of Boston. This is one of the sites of the Green Harbors Project, an environmental restoration program founded and directed Dr. Anamarija Frankic. An ecologist and Biomimicry Fellow at UMass Boston, she and her students are using biomimicry – the application of nature-inspired solutions – to revolutionize the health and function of Boston’s harbor.

In her bright yellow windbreaker and tall blue rain boots, Dr. Frankic expertly leads me through coastal underbrush down to the water, where she points out debris and pollution that plague the cove. Over the course of several decades – even centuries — urban wastewater and nutrient-rich pollution have destroyed Boston’s coastal habitats, creating dead zones devoid of vegetation and aquatic wildlife.

After Vice President George H. W. Bush declared it “the dirtiest” harbor in America in 1988, Boston finally launched a massive multi-billion dollar cleanup project that spanned over a decade. The project culminated in a Deer Island Sewage Treatment Plant renovation that installed a 9.5 mile pipeline which diverted raw sewage beyond the harbor and out into the ocean. While the water quality has improved, Frankic knows more must be done to restore a resilient and sustainable coastal ecosystem in this urban harbor. To do so, she’s enlisted the help of a natural ally: oysters.

screen-shot-2016-12-08-at-12-15-28-pm

Oysters from a reef in Savin Hill Cove. Photo: Ron Cowie

Oysters were once an abundant feature of Boston’s colonial-era harbor. Records from the 1630s describe oyster banks large enough to keep boats from navigating Boston’s rivers, and oyster shells were even a popular material for paving colonial Boston’s streets. By the beginning of the 20th century, however, overfishing, pollution, and habitat degradation from landfill and dams drove the native oyster population to extinction.

Why bring oysters back? Oysters are natural filtration machines: as filter feeders, oysters naturally remove overabundant micronutrients like nitrogen and phosphorous from the water. In fact, one adult oyster can purify 50 gallons of water per day. Simply by existing, oysters improve water quality and make aquatic environments more conducive for other forms of life.

Oysters’ abilities are not limited to water filtration: oyster reefs also stabilize coastal sediment from erosion, provide shelter for creatures like snails and crabs that like to hide in the crevices between oysters, and are a food source for larger organisms, like birds and humans. An increase in their population could even help the Massachusetts fishing economy.

In an adjacent cove, Dr. Frankic and I carefully make our way down a rocky slope to the water at low tide to check the health of an oyster bed she established in 2013. What was once a desolate cove now holds a giant cluster of 150,000 oysters. As we explore the bed, Frankic’s admiration of oysters bubbles up to the surface. “Oysters are smart. They like to live together, to be close to one another for support and for protection.”

Oyster beds stretch out into the water at Savin Hill Cove. The UMass Boston campus sits on the horizon. Photo: Rob Crowe

Oyster beds stretch out into the water at Savin Hill Cove. The UMass Boston campus sits on the horizon.
Photo: Ron Cowie

Frankic then draws my attention to abundant slimy, leafy plants that line the rocky shore, suitably named rockweed. Its existence here is a good sign – an indication that the oysters are helping to reestablish a livable habitat.

Despite signs of the project’s progress, there is still more work to be done. Her UMass Boston students are busy restoring eelgrass and salt marsh grasses – plants that work in tandem with oyster reefs to attract aquatic life – and exploring other natural technologies to facilitate the process of coastal ecosystem recovery.

And sometimes, there are setbacks. As we walked further into the oyster bed, Frankic stopped short. “Someone was here,” she said grimly. “This area has been raked.” Sure enough, a long strip of bare sand cut through the bed. This is the first time she has ever seen the bed damaged. When asked why someone would do this, Frankic was at a loss – perhaps it was an accident, an act of hostility, or someone harvesting the oysters to eat or to sell.

Dr. Frankic and her students regularly perform field research to analyze ecosystem health. Photo: Someone

Dr. Frankic (right) and her students regularly perform research to analyze ecosystem health.
Photo: Green Harbors Project

Dr. Frankic is used to challenges in her career. After growing up on a small Croatian island and attending university in Zagreb, she commenced a nonlinear journey to ecosystem restoration. “I didn’t have a simple track. I just went like organic growth, like a sprout of mold going everywhere.” Her aptitude for holistic and interdisciplinary thinking, however, meant overcoming professional challenges. “I tried to fit the form in science, in academia, in government, in the World Bank and the UN,” she recalls, but time and time again she became frustrated by a culture of fragmentation and compartmentalization, and a lack of collaboration across sectors.

Tired of compromising efficacy to conform to the status quo, Frankic carved out a niche of her own creation. In addition to teaching at UMass Boston and two universities in Croatia, she also works to engage local residents, politicians, fisherman, and elementary school students in ecosystem restoration.

She works as an educator to make it easier for future generations to follow a holistic path like hers. “Education needs to follow the needs of the next generation, and we are not very good in that,” she says. Rather than create reactionary solutions to environmental problems, she wants her students to be leaders that proactively create healthy and thriving environments. By empowering students to perform exploratory field research and question existing systems, she hopes her students will promote positive change in the world.

Already, the positive ripples from the Green Harbors Project are spreading beyond Boston. Dr. Frankic now has oyster restoration projects in Cape Cod, Nantucket, and internationally in her native Croatia. Similar initiatives have been adopted in Brooklyn and the Chesapeake Bay. Inexpensive and low-maintenance, oysters are a natural, simple, and extremely effective tool that can improve aquatic ecosystem health around the world. “Water is life,” she reminds me. “We have to let the water teach us how to build our cities.”

Redefining Success of the Climate Movement: One Student at a Time

When considering progress to address the climate crisis by reducing fossil fuel use, many people may think of the Paris Climate Agreement. However, Alyssa Lee’s career redefines the scale of success in the climate movement. Rather than relying on politicians and diplomats to shape the future of our planet, divestment campaigns at colleges across the United States are empowering young people to take control of the world that they want to live in.

screen-shot-2016-12-07-at-10-03-57-pm

Alyssa Lee wearing a 350 Mass Action T-shirt. 350 Mass Action is the volunteer grassroots group affiliated with the Better Future Project.

In September of 2015, Alyssa left her home in
sunny California to join the Better Future Project in Boston, Massachusetts. The Better Future Project is a non-profit organization that works to promote grassroots movements to address climate change. Working as a campus organizer, Alyssa pioneered the new Climate Justice Fellowship Program for Massachusetts college students. This fellowship provides mentoring, training, and helps establish connections among students seeking to start or strengthen their own divestment campaigns on campus.

Alyssa succinctly states the goal of college divestment campaigns as “putting pressure on school administrators to consider whether it is ethical to profit from fossil fuels.”

Students can take control of what Alyssa describes as their “access to power.” Through these campaigns, students can realize their ability to make a change by putting the spotlight on school administrators. This type of public exposure is all part of a larger mission to stigmatize or brand fossil fuels as undesirable.

Interestingly, Alyssa points out that many colleges don’t have direct investments in fossil fuels, yet school administrators still refuse to take a public stance on the issue. It may seem strange for students to fight so hard for divestment when their schools don’t actually have fossil fuel investments. However, divestment campaigns are symbolically important.

Although money often equates to power, reputation is everything. When colleges refuse to take a stance against the fossil fuel industry, they perpetuate its “social license to operate.” This legitimacy allows fossil fuel companies to continue operating, generating pollution, and contributing to the climate crisis. Divestment challenges this legitimacy by raising opposition to fossil fuels and publically questioning the acceptability of college administrators profiting from this industry.

The fossil fuel divestment movement was born at Swarthmore College in 2011. Since the movement started, there have been notable divestment wins at two-dozen colleges across the country. This past May, University of Massachusetts Amherst became the first major public university to divest its endowment from fossil fuels, with the president proudly stating, “Important societal change often begins on college campuses and it often begins with students.” Despite these successes, many college students face challenges mobilizing movements on their campuses.

This is where Alyssa comes in.

Through the Climate Justice Fellowship, Alyssa provides coaching to college students struggling with their leadership roles on campus and the difficulty inherent in positions of power. “People feel uncomfortable being asked to lead. They hesitate to delegate and ask for people’s time, push people, and make decisions.”

What qualifies Alyssa to guide these students?

Alyssa speaks from personal experience. She was a devoted leader and organizer as a student at UCLA up until she graduated in 2014. During her time, Alyssa co-founded a student-run food cooperative and started the Fossil Free UCLA divestment campaign. Alyssa recalls that, as she became an organizer, “a lot of people I respected told me to step into a role I may be uncomfortable with.” It’s easy to see why Alyssa was asked to step up to the plate — she’s a natural organizer, balancing both charisma and optimism. Alyssa went on to train at the Divestment Student Network her senior year, while continuing her critical role in her own school’s divestment campaign.

In addition to mentorship, the Climate Justice Fellowship fosters a sense of solidarity among students fighting for divestment across Massachusetts. Young leaders come together monthly, where they receive training and form cross-campus relationships. These connections help form a broad network of support as students face the daunting task of confronting school administrators and one of the most powerful industries in the world. Alyssa helped to coordinate a cross-campus effort between Amherst, Lowell, Dartmouth, and Boston, bringing these schools together for the first time. Previous fellows have emphasized the importance of these relationships as a source of inspiration and reassurance. Nina Hazelton, a spring 2016 fellow from UMass Amherst, stated, “every time we get together, we are shifting power.”

In the efforts to provide mentoring, training, and connections among schools, Alyssa admits that time for conversation regarding environmental justice issues such as pollution from fossil fuel production and transportation is limited. The “main problem is that we assume many people already know. We all take it for granted.” However, referring to the pollution associated with fossil fuel production and transport, Alyssa said with full sincerity, “I would love to spend fellowship training talking about this.”

Issues of environmental justice are what sparked Alyssa’s passion towards divestment as a student—leading her to the role that she plays now in supporting many other divestment campaigns across Massachusetts.

After so many campaigns, including the UCLA campaign in which the school did not fully divest from fossil fuels, one might think Alyssa would be worn out. However, when asked how she deals with disappointment, Alyssa acknowledged that many divestment campaigns do hear no. But “each disappointing moment should never be bad, it is just momentum for the next thing. Every moment is an opportunity. The next action will always push forward.”

 

 

Dr. Erik Zettler: Making Waves at Sea Semester

In the spring of 2015, Helena McMonagle, a college student, collected samples for her Sea Semester project in the middle of the North Atlantic Ocean. With fine meshed plankton nets, she trawled the top of the ocean. But with the plankton came the unexpected.

“I was so surprised to be in a place that seemed so remote and so pristine. But then you pull up this plankton net and there is plastic in there and evidence of human waste. It was really shocking how much plastic we found.”

Photo Credit: Amy Siuda (Chief Scientist)

Plastic found by Helena. Photo credit: Amy Siuda (Chief Scientist)

 

For the past 45 years, Sea Semester (SEA) has been training the next generation of oceanographers about marine environmental issues by getting them out of the classroom and onto the ocean. Integral to Helena’s experience was one of her mentors, Dr. Erik Zettler. A recently retired Sea Semester professor and current researcher with SEA in Woods Hole, Massachusetts, Dr. Erik Zettler has been pivotal in research on marine plastic debris. Utilizing the research power of undergraduates, Dr. Zettler has investigated the living communities whose homes are on our plastic. He calls these plastic communities the “Plastisphere.”

Photo credit: http://www.sea.edu/plastics/team/erik_zettler

Dr. Erik Zettler at work. Photo credit: http://www.sea.edu/plastics/team/erik_zettler

 

These communities may be small, but they have large and devastating impacts. These pieces of plastic transport harmful creatures as they drift in the ocean’s currents, including human pathogens and algae responsible for toxic red algae tides.

 

With about eight million tons of plastic entering the oceans every year– the equivalent of two empire state buildings every month– the fate of this plastic and its consequences are worth investigating.

For 22 years, Dr. Zettler has investigated microbial communities, focusing on the Plastisphere in the past decade. Before working for Sea Semester, he was a research technician at Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution. He was attracted to SEA by their boats docked right across the street.  Sea Semester is known for their two sailboats, which look like relics of the 1700s with their huge white sails and two masts. In fact, they are sophisticated research vessels.

Sea Semester boat. Photo Credit: https://syr-sa.terradotta.com/index.cfm?FuseAction=programs.ViewProgram&Program_ID=10287

Sea Semester boat. Photo credit: https://syr-sa.terradotta.com/index.cfm?FuseAction=programs.ViewProgram&Program_ID=10287

 

Dr. Zettler realized Sea Semester was a perfect match when he got the opportunity to travel with them on a short research trip. “I absolutely loved it. It was a combination of everything I like,” he reminisced with a smile during our Skype conversation. “It’s fieldwork on a sailing boat, high quality science, and teaching. Three things I really enjoy in one, ” he said counting each aspect on a finger. When a permanent position became available in 1994, he joined Sea Semester full time.

Since his first ocean research voyage, Dr. Zettler has spent up to one-third of every year at sea doing research. But, he still depends a lot on student research. “All of my research at SEA pretty much was done through student research projects,” Dr. Zettler said appreciatively. “Essentially they’re acting as research assistants.” At SEA, students like Helena McMonagle help with ideas, processing and analyzing the samples, and collecting data.

“They treated us like colleagues,” Helena described of her time working with Dr. Zettler and his wife, Dr. Amaral-Zettler. “It was empowering.” And it is easy to see why his students respected him so much.

During our Skype conversation, Dr. Zettler was modest and friendly, seeming more like an engaging professor and sea-weathered researcher in his blue fleece and wire-rimmed glasses, than a renowned researcher. He has worked on more than 30 published papers, including a 2015 paper that was featured in the Falmouth Enterprise, a local Massachusetts paper.

The paper discussed policy implications of the Plastisphere, the composition of which Dr. Zettler and other Woods Hole based researchers discovered is dependent on its location. Plastics in the North Atlantic Ocean had different organisms, like disease causing pathogens, living on them than in the North Pacific Ocean. This is an important discovery because it means that plastic debris might have site-specific effects on the environment and marine organisms that accidentally ingest the plastic. Political efforts to mitigate the impacts of marine plastic debris will require equally regionally specific efforts.

Dr. Zettler clearly loves the research he does, but he also highlighted the importance of policy in bridging the divide between science and change—a bridge this 2015 paper starts to build.

“You have to stop plastic at the source, which is land,” he emphasized, when I asked what we must do now to solve our marine plastic debris problem. He stressed the importance of minimizing the use of single-use plastic. Single-use plastics are about half of the 300,000,000 million tons of plastic created every year, and some of it can be replaced by biodegradable materials, which can be industrially composted. Examples of policies that minimize single-use plastics include plastic bag bans and fees.

Stopping plastic at its source is especially important because researchers don’t know where most of the plastic is ending up once it gets into the ocean. “We are putting in eight million tons of plastic every year, but when we try to count the plastic that’s floating, we find only 300,000 tons” Dr. Zettler said. That’s like the weight of 20 empire state buildings going missing every year. This means that marine plastic debris may be having other unknown effects on oceanic ecosystems.

With the help of Sea Semester student research, maybe Dr. Zettler will solve that mystery.  For now, he continues to lay the foundation for future policy that will alleviate our ocean’s plastic pollution crisis and impacts of the Plastisphere.

 

CitySprouts: Learning by Growing

It’s a crisp, sunny fall day perfect for pressing fresh apple cider. I’m at the Tobin Montessori School in Cambridge to volunteer at one of CitySprouts’ annual cider pressings and speak with Andrea Locke, their Community Relations Director. CitySprouts is a non-profit organization that partners with public schools to build school gardens and incorporate them into the curriculum. It began in two Cambridge schools in 2001 and has since expanded to include 24 public schools in Boston and Cambridge.

Andrea and I find a spot to sit on the leaf-strewn lawn of the school, with the garden plots behind us, and begin discussing her journey to CitySprouts. Although she has only been working for the organization since last spring, it is clear that she believes in the CitySprouts mission, especially its commitment to experiential learning.

Andrea is a firm believer in the idea of “learning best by getting your hands dirty.” She explains that planting seeds and watching them grow is “very hands-on” and “a very visceral experience that I just think is vital to learning.”

Andrea Locke, Community Relations Director of CitySprouts

Andrea Locke, Community Relations Director of CitySprouts

As a native of the Finger Lakes region of New York, Andrea grew up playing in gardens. When it was time to go to college, she chose Warren Wilson College in North Carolina. Warren Wilson is a very different from a typical college because, as Andrea explains it, “The entire campus is run by students.” She worked in the Office of Admissions, but other students were responsible for doing the plumbing and electricity, and everyone had to work on the 500-acre farm that provided the food for the campus.

“I feel like a lot of my life experiences have been building on each other,” Andrea explains. Her major at Warren Wilson was History and Political Science. It wasn’t until she attended graduate school at the Lund Institute in Sweden that she became more interested in social policy, which led her into the nonprofit world. Before CitySprouts, Andrea worked as an AmeriCorps VISTA member with Give US Your Poor, a Boston organization which seeks to increase public awareness of homelessness. That experience, she says, helped her gain many of the skills she is using in her work today, especially social media skills.

As Community Relations Director, Andrea is responsible for cultivating and maintaining relationships with donors as well as arranging volunteers for events such as the cider pressings. One of her goals for this year is to get the students’ families more involved with CitySprouts. As she was arranging the volunteers for cider pressing, she tried to get as many parents involved as possible. She is also responsible for planning the spring fundraising event, Dig It!, and has lowered the ticket prices to encourage more parents to come.

The importance of fundraising for a non-profit cannot be understated. None of CitySprouts’ work would be possible without Andrea’s work. In addition to the school partnership program, CitySprouts offers an after-school program and a summer program for middle school students. Adequate fundraising allows them to provide these programs free for all students, permitting more children from lower-income families to participate.

The school garden plots that CitySprouts helps the students to tend do not produce enough vegetables to supply the cafeteria, so instead the students or teachers take home the produce to share it with their families. Andrea also tells me that they like to allow some of it to “die on the vine,” so that students can see how vegetables decompose and understand that as a part of nature.

CitySprouts does, however, interact with the school cafeterias in other ways. Andrea tells me that the cafeteria staff will sometimes use fresh herbs from the garden. Last spring, the 6th, 7th, and 8th graders in CitySprouts’ after-school program each developed their own sauce for the local coconut-crusted redfish that is served in Cambridge cafeterias. The students voted to select their favorite, and the winning sauce is now served in all Cambridge cafeterias.

CitySprouts Summer Program

CitySprouts Summer Program

The summer program allows middle school students to engage more with the gardens and understand the larger food system. The lunches provided to the students as a part of the program are made with the produce they helped to grow. Furthermore, the activities encourage them to consider the larger food system outside of the garden plot. In one assignment, they imagine the journey of a product from the farm to the grocery store and calculate what percentage of the final price goes to the farmer. The students also volunteer at Gaining Ground, a farm in Concord that provides produce for food pantries, which gives them the opportunity to see how a full-scale farm operates.

Today, nutrition is often broken down into nutrients and calories, but CitySprouts takes a more holistic view. Andrea explains, “we believe that introducing vegetables and just getting students more familiar with them will just make them more comfortable, so when they see it again, they’re more likely to eat it.”

She also appreciates the sense of ownership the CitySprouts method gives the kids. She explains how the little kids will plant the beans, measure them, watch them grow, “and then they eat the beans, and they really like them,” she concludes, visibly giddy.

The cider pressings are a little bit different than the majority of CitySprouts events. Although it is still hands-on, it is less of an educational event and more of a fun one to get the kids outside to see the garden and involve teachers who have not used the garden in their curriculum. The apples are from Kimball Farm, about 40 miles outside of Boston, and are what is known as “second-pick” apples, “so they’re pretty gnarly looking, but it makes no difference for cider,” Andrea explains.

As a Texas native, I’ve never made cider, so I get a quick explanation of the process before the next class comes out. I am at the chopping station, helping the students to cut the apples into chunks with butter knives. After the washing, chopping and mashing have been completed, we all gather around the cider press, a wood and red-painted metal contraption that, like the apple masher, looks most akin to something the pioneers would have used.

A CitySprouts cider pressing

A CitySprouts cider pressing

We all take turns helping to twist the press until it is tight and then to pump the lever until all the juice is squeezed out of the mashed apples. Next, we distribute the cider in compostable paper cups, and ask the students to wait to drink because we are going to do a toast. Since apple cider pressing is a fall tradition in New England, we decide to toast to fall. We all say “To Fall!,” clink our paper cups together, and have a sip. It’s easily the best apple cider I’ve ever had and the kids can’t get enough of it.

No whale of an issue with offshore wind

A small island is unexpectedly spearheading the push for offshore wind energy. Block Island, RI’s five turbines will begin generating electricity by December as the first offshore wind farm in the nation. Block Island not only demonstrates that offshore wind energy is attainable, but that it can also be built in ways that protects local wildlife. Amber Hewett, who works at the National Wildlife Federation, shares these lessons while proselytizing offshore wind and the protection of New England wildlife.

fullsizerender

Amber Hewett, NWF

On a grey-skied New England autumn day I met young and enthusiastic organizer Amber Hewett at a café. She works for the National Wildlife Federation (NWF) on a campaign to promote offshore wind development in New England, New York, and New Jersey through public engagement and communication with state legislators. While some of her coworkers have been pushing for offshore wind energy for over a decade with little progress, Hewett’s four years working on offshore wind development has seen monumental progress. Hewett, a recent graduate from UMass Amherst, explained to me that offshore wind energy is “a beacon of hope” as the “largest untapped energy solution.” And her home state is leading the way.

Last summer Massachusetts Governor Charlie Baker signed an energy bill making a historic commitment to 1,600 MW of offshore wind energy. Just one megawatt of offshore wind energy will power more than 400 homes. This is the first large-scale commitment to offshore wind in the United States, which could jumpstart the industry in the states. Offshore wind as a renewable energy source has many benefits but the memory of Cape Wind in Massachusetts complicates it.

When I asked for a quick defense of Massachusetts offshore wind development, Hewett reeled off five-points with a quick smile. First, the abundance and access of wind resource “cannot be overstated.” Second, the wind offshore blows when electricity demand peaks. Third, the biggest cities are on the coast, which reduces transmission line infrastructure required. Fourth, New England has limited space for solar and wind power onshore. And lastly offshore wind can be built in a “wildlife friendly manner,” a factor especially important for someone who works for the National Wildlife Federation.

A large portion of Hewett’s job is public education, through community forums and writing articles about offshore wind for NWF’s blog. Hewett reported that at public energy forums there is some confusion around the benefits of offshore wind at first. She believes this stems from the confusion and misinformation around the proposed Cape Wind project south of Cape Cod. “Once you capture the scale of opportunity,” she explains, “people usually get to an excited place.” Polls conducted in 2015 reflect this. Over 60% of Massachusetts residents support statewide carbon-free energy and two thirds favor offshore wind for new energy generation.

right-whale-new-england-aquarium-570x375

A North Atlantic Right Whale

Massachusetts residents often raise important concerns at the community public forums Hewett holds. A major concern centers on the wildlife impacts of the offshore wind turbines. Here in Massachusetts that concern is primarily focused on the North Atlantic right whale. This whale species is critically endangered, with fewer than 500 individual whales in the North Atlantic. With a steady and determined voice, Hewett affirms that with so few of this whale species “we cannot spare a single one, we cannot compromise on that at all.”

The National Wildlife Federation is a non-profit conservation education and advocacy organization with the mission to seek solutions to environmental issues that work for both wildlife and people. The NWF’s endorsement of offshore wind does not come lightly. Hewett explained to me “as NWF we only endorse projects that we consider to be responsible during all stages of development.” Hewett said that many people are surprised that a wildlife conservation organization endorses an energy source. “We really believe that offshore wind can move forward in a safe way minimizing or avoiding impacts.”

The main risks for North Atlantic right whales occur during the construction phase of offshore wind when collisions with boats and the construction noise pose the greatest threat. The noise from pile driving– drilling turbines into the ocean floor – disrupts their communication, impeding both migration and feeding. Once the turbines are in place, however, they pose no threat to the whales.

Offshore wind can be constructed in a wildlife-friendly manner to minimize such risks. Hewett considers Deepwater Wind’s five-turbine project off of Block Island, RI as a model, praising their voluntary efforts “to go above and beyond requirements.” Deepwater Wind collaborated with the NWF and other environmental law and advocacy organizations to protect these rare whales during construction.

Protective measures included reduced vessel speeds and constant aerial monitoring. Construction would stop if a whale was spotted in the area. Additionally, during peak migration season, specific construction activities were halted. For example, between November 23rd and March 21st, Deepwater Wind did not undertake any drilling. Noise reduction tools and technology were also used to further decrease the impact of construction noise. Hewett emphasized that the NWF believes that Deepwater Wind’s protective measures can be scaled up for large projects, like ones now slated in Massachusetts.

Hewett reminded me that Massachusetts needs energy infrastructure, especially with the Pilgrim Nuclear power plant closing. “Saying no to offshore wind is saying yes to something else,” Hewett explained. 1600 megawatts of offshore wind powering 240,000 homes is on our eastern horizon. This future not only combats climate change but also protects local wildlife.

 

Switching Gears: Former Boston Bike Czar Nicole Freedman is Back in Town

When Nicole Freedman was a junior in high school, her father offered to share his 1972 Chevy Nova. “I was kind of a nerd, but even as a nerd I knew that was social suicide, so I biked to school,” she recalls with a hearty laugh.

Nearly three decades later, Freedman is a Stanford alumna, an Olympic athlete, and has spearheaded biking programs for two major U.S. cities. Recently, she made the move to Newton in order to move the town forward on transportation.

Freedman, always the adventurer, grew up in Wellesley, Massachusetts, but traveled around Europe as a child with her father, a professor at Boston University, and mother, an avid lover of architecture. It was on these family vacations that her love for cities began to take shape.

During her senior year at Stanford, Freedman joined the cycling team despite starting out as a runner. “It was a sport that I loved and a sport that I was good at,” Freedman says with a shrug during an interview in her office. Good is an understatement — she represented the United States in the 119.7 kilometer women’s road race at the 2000 Summer Olympics in Sydney, Australia.

In 2007, Freedman retired from a successful career in racing. Then, armed with an undergraduate degree in urban planning she had earned over a decade earlier, Freedman became the director of the Boston Bikes program. Most people simply referred to her as Boston’s “bike czar.” Speaking of the transition from non-stop training to nine to five desk duty, Freedman says, “I was truly ready. I had found something that was just a perfect match, in so many ways.”

Freedman still commutes seven miles to and from work each day. Here she is pictured with one of the ten or so bikes she owns -- she's not sure of the exact count.

Freedman still commutes seven miles to and from work each day. Here she is pictured with one of the ten or so bikes she owns — she’s not sure of the exact count.

Freedman entered the transportation-planning world at an exciting time. “Right before me, biking was sort of known as the 40-year-old white male in spandex that shouldn’t be,” Freedman jokes, pulling her legs up onto her chair and fiddling with some paperclips on her desk. Since then, biking has become more mainstream, potentially because of its appeal to the “hipster” faction, in which biking is seen as a cool, retro way of getting around. Having more demand and public support for bicycle facilities makes it easier for bike czars like Freedman to justify spending precious taxpayer dollars.

Freedman’s reign as Boston’s bike czar is considered by most to be a tremendous success. She is responsible for the completion of Boston’s first 92 miles of bike lanes, which is nearly halfway to the 2020 goal established in Boston’s Bike Network Plan. Other important goals of the plan include halving the number of accidents while increasing biking’s share of total traffic from around 2% to 10%; for comparison, Portland, a haven for cyclists, has a rate that has been stagnant at 6%.

Boston’s bikeshare program, Hubway, established under Freedman’s leadership and among the first and most successful of its kind in the nation, has played an integral part in achieving these goals. The program started out small in 2011 with just 60 stations totaling 600 bicycles; by 2016, it doubled the number of stations and bicycles. The effect in five short years has been immediate: Boston was ranked the fifth most bicycle-friendly U.S. city in 2015.

A map of the Hubway network as of 2014. /Wikipedia

A map of the Hubway network as of 2014. /Wikipedia

Whether Freedman’s tenure as Newton’s Director of Transportation is as successful has yet to be seen. City-dwellers tend to be more educated about and more open to innovations and advances in transportation, while suburbanites are very attached to their personal vehicles. Mindset and politics, as well as lack of funding, are some of the biggest obstacles that Freedman has had to overcome in all of the places that she has worked.

Working in a town like Newton, with less than 100,000 residents, can be challenging for another reason. “There’s now a formula and a blueprint for what you do in a big city, but not nearly as much for smaller cities.” Freedman adds, however, “I kind of prefer this size because you can actually get more done — from a personal standpoint, you have less levels of bureaucracy, so it’s more straightforward.”

Newton is also not your typical suburban town. There is vocal and broad support for change, due to unsafe road conditions for cyclists, pedestrians, and drivers alike. Freedman was brought on in September 2016 to help develop and implement the new transportation strategy, known as “Newton-in-Motion.” “It’s an opportunity to see the big picture and work on the big picture,” Freedman says of her newfound role.

The big picture is that American cities big and small simply cannot accommodate any more cars. Cities like Boston, Seattle, New York, and Portland, among many others, have begun to recognize this fact and take action, becoming centers of innovation and proving to each other and the nation at large that there is in fact a better way forward. “It’s very car-centric at the state and federal level,” Freedman clarifies. “So you know, it’s bottoms-up, cities, instead of states, that are the movement.”

This movement is also driven by a larger change in the transportation landscape — cars are disappearing from America almost as quickly as they arrived a century ago. The number of vehicle miles travelled per year has been declining since 2004, and unlike previous declines, this time high gas prices aren’t the culprit: Millennials are leading the charge. With this kind of tailwind, there’s nowhere for Freedman to go but forward.

Bold Cities Need Bold People

Bianca Hermansen Touring Us Around the City

1st day of Livability Class with Bianca 2014

Bianca Hermansen strutted into class with long red hair, buzzed on one side and a black dress that poured to her glamorous platform heels. You could see the confidence in her walk. I was her student in a class called Strategies of Urban Livability at the Danish Institute for Study Abroad in Copenhagen. On our first day of class she brought us outside and onto the streets. She stopped in the middle of the street and told us, “This is a shared street. Cars, motorcycles, bikes, and pedestrians all have to share this street, and no one has the right of way. Many people argue this is unsafe”. Then she smiled and said, “I will perform several tests to prove that wrong.”

The students scuttled closer to watch Bianca. She turned around, and began weaving through the crowd. As a bike approached, she suddenly spun around and lunged in front of the bike’s path. The bicyclist swerved and continued forward, but not after a brief glare and several muttered words. She turned around and asked, “Did you see that? Even after I purposefully blocked the bike, the bicyclists was skilled in maneuvering around me. People in shared streets are hyperaware of their surroundings, which actually makes these streets safe”. Bianca turned forward, and continued her test eight more times. Not once was she hit.

Bianca is the sort of person people gawk in awe from her actions and words. She is not afraid to be bold. Occasionally she even drops the f-bomb. Today, she is running her own research based urban design office, Cititek, in Copenhagen. One of the many things she does is consult with municipalities, cities, and private practices on how to design user-friendly cities. For example, she is developing the Strategic Cultural Plan in Larvick, Norway that will commit to user-driven design work. This means instead of plans being showcased on miniature plastic buildings and streets, they will be tested and prototyped in the city by involving the users or the local community.

Bianca’s work is driven by the principle that livable cities are inherently sustainable. Recently, I asked Bianca about methods for creating sustainable megacities. I asked, “How can megacities be sustainab–“. She brought her hand to her mouth and coughed to the side, “That’s fucking impossible”, she interrupted, “Sorry, continue”.

After reading books about sustainable megacities, I entered the conversation sure they were possible. So, I threw my assumptions aside and asked her if cities are more sustainable than rural settings.”Oh. There is no doubt about it”, she replied.”Collective systems are more efficient than individual systems”.

“Collective systems are more efficient than individual systems”.

She explained how working together is part of the culture in Scandinavia, and that is why Copenhagen is equipped to prepare for  climate change.”We just have a long history of solving problems together because we have very few resources available”, she paused,  “You know, we don’t have wild life, our soil is very scarce in terms of nutrients, our climate is shitty. We’ve had all odds against us. So we have learned at a very early age in our history that we needed to work together or we wouldn’t make it through the winter”.

Bianca’s argument that culture and history of a community drive climate-action decisions is unique. Her solutions for cities are not based around solar panels or electric cars, but rather, collective systems. The neat thing is that the collective systems culture can be built into the infrastructure of any city. So, designing built environments that inherently encourage people to live collectively is sustainable.

One way Copenhagen does this with its bike lanes. The lanes are the size of car lanes, and have more traffic as well. The blue painted lanes are protected by trees, parked bikes, or asphalt barriers. By designing safe and convenient bike lanes, people prefer biking over other modes of transport. This is the sort of culture that Bianca wants to bring to other cities, but which is not feasible for megacities.

The thing is, cities and megacities are very different. The key contrast is land size. Bianca explained that sustainable megacities are not  possible with our current technology. The sheer size of megacities is impractical because we do not have affordable techniques to run them. There is a limit to the size of pipes, power of pumps, and even the frequency of a bus loop. With her index finger, she drew an imaginary bus route in the air and explained that a bus route depends on the distance from the beginning to end. As more land is used for a megacity, the bus route will get longer, and will take an hour or more to get from one location to another. That isn’t cost effective or convenient for people and the bus providers. Smaller is not always better, but it sure helps for sustainability.

This level of pragmatic thinking is the sort of thinking that makes Bianca different from other planners. She experiences a city as a user. Her designs are guided by human emotional, physical, and psychology responses. That is why she declared that “a sustainable city is a city”. A good city will need to address human and environmental needs. So, once human experience are core to city plans, cities will be transformed into livable and sustainable spaces.

“a sustainable city is a city”

Bianca is not slowing down a bit with her work. I asked Bianca what she hopes her legacy will be. She replied, “I’m more of a marathon, rather than a sprinter kind of person. It’s okay. It takes awhile. That’s totally fine, as long as we get it right. And we are going to get it right because I’ve made up my mind that we’re going to get it right. You’re  getting there kicking and screaming, I’m going to fucking drag you there, you people”.  With her boldness, I confident we will make great strides.

 

 

 

 

 

Don’t Refuse to Reuse: Chemist discovers new REE-cycling method

_DSC9638

Marion Emmert checks the progress of a chemical reaction that will recover the valuable metals found in electric car engines. Source: WPI

When you first enter the office of chemist Marion Emmert, not only will you see bookshelves of academic chemistry textbooks, but also a miniature rubber duck, a goat plushie, and cartoon strips. Emmert especially prizes her goat stuffed animal, Gompei, who also happens to be the university mascot. She won him in a faculty contest. “I’m very competitive,” she says with a mischievous grin.

Emmert is an associate professor at Worcester Polytechnic Institute, a university that specializes in real-world applications of science and engineering. In September, Professor Emmert and postdoctoral fellow H.M. Dhammika Bandara became some of the first people to successfully recycle the rare earth elements (REEs) inside of broken electric/hybrid car motors. REEs are the magic ingredients inside many modern technologies. In electric cars and wind turbines, REEs act as powerful magnets that make the engines run more efficiently. REE magnets are irreplaceable, because they are as much as five times stronger than other magnets. REEs also increase the computing abilities of laptops, phones, and tablets, and are used in diverse fields such as medicine and military defense systems.

The development of REE recycling is especially important because the U.S. needs its own domestic REE supply. During the past fifteen years, China has controlled over 86% of the REE market, because it artificially keeps REE prices too low for other nations to compete. Securing domestic U.S. production of REE resources is a key driver of Emmert’s work. China’s control of REE prices is essentially a power play, she explained. By maintaining its REE monopoly, China can restrict U.S. access to these critical resources. This occurred in 2011, when China cut its REE exports by 40%. In the space of a year, REEs prices increased by as much as 600%. “We [the U.S.] didn’t have any solutions,” Emmert said bluntly. “We didn’t even have the knowledge or the technology to address this [lack of REE resources].” That’s a scary thought, especially because REEs are so important for many different technological applications.

Emmert’s new technique could allow the United States to become a more competitive, self-reliant player in the REE industry, independent from the volatile REE prices of Chinese suppliers. Even though the recycling process involves a series of complex chemical reactions, Emmert is used to explaining her research to a general audience.  Here’s the gist: electric and hybrid vehicle engines possess valuable amounts of REEs, but they’re difficult to separate from the other metals in the engine. However, unlike steel or copper, rare earth elements dissolve quickly in certain acids, such as hydrochloric acid. By soaking the engines in these acids, Emmert can isolate the REEs from the rest of the recycled engine. This process works so well that Emmert’s team can recover over 80% of the REEs in the electric car engines. The recovered REEs are 99.9% pure.

For Emmert, finding a new source of REEs is not only about competing in a monopolized REE market – it’s also about recycling them in a way that minimizes environmental and human health impacts. “This is dear to my heart,” Emmert said. “People don’t always understand. To be environmentally friendly, it’s not just about safety for nature, but also for the people. People are part of the environment.” In contrast to many scientists’ energy-intensive recycling methods and use of dangerous concentrations of acids to recover valuable metals, Emmert’s recycling process minimizes waste, increases energy efficiency, and reduces safety hazards. For example, Emmert designed the REE recovery process so that waste by-products such as corrosive acids could be reused, instead of ending up in a landfill. She also used these acids in low quantities, so as not to endanger the humans handling the products. “It’s really cool. [Recycling REEs] is so simple [and safe] that you could do it in your house! But I wouldn’t suggest it,” she added quickly.

On its own, Emmert’s REE recycling method is remarkably environmentally friendly. However, perhaps the greatest advantage of the new recycling process is its potential to reduce the environmental impacts associated with REE mining. Mining currently supplies all of the world’s REE demand, but it also produces enormous amounts of pollution: just one ton of REEs produces over 66 tons of waste! While much of this waste is composed of waste rock, significant portions of it are either radioactive or contain dangerous waste acids. In fact, the U.S. shut down its largest REE mine partly because it leaked hundreds of thousands of gallons of radioactive wastewater into the surrounding environment.

By utilizing recycled REE, the U.S. can lessen its reliance on virgin materials. Most importantly, ‘mining’ electric car engines for REEs does not produce radioactive waste. Using Emmert’s approach, even the acids needed to recycle REEs would be reused. Recycling offers a low-energy, low-waste source of REEs that reduces the need for environmentally destructive mining operations. And while electric/hybrid vehicle engines recycling alone cannot provide the U.S. with all of the REEs it needs, the same recycling process can be applied to other engines, such as wind turbines, which can contain over 800 pounds of REEs each.

Before Emmert patented her recycling process in September 2015, mining was the only way to acquire REEs. She hopes that within a few years, the U.S. will construct the first commercial REE recycling facility based on her research. But there are two major challenges. First, the recycling process has only proven to be successful in a small-scale, laboratory setting. Recycling thousands of engines on a daily basis will pose new technological and implementation challenges. Second, REE recycling lacks commercial viability. Between 2002 and 2013, the price of REEs varied greatly, from $12 to nearly $95 per kilogram. With such volatile prices, can REE recycling succeed in the real world? According to Emmert, the fickle nature of the prices is precisely the reason why companies should invest in recycling technology today. Businesses need to diversify their source for REEs. That way, if one source dries up, the company can rely on other suppliers. Although recycling may be more expensive in the short-term, Emmert argues that REE recycling can help preserve business sustainability for decades.  

Whether for economic sustainability, U.S. resource independence, or environmental preservation, REE recycling offers an important alternative to the status quo. “It’s in everyone’s best interest to diversify the economy,” Emmert said. Recycling may be the REE industry’s next great breakthrough in terms of both economic and environmental sustainability.

Draining the Bathtub: How the City of Hoboken is Preparing for Another Superstorm Sandy

When Caleb Stratton started working as the principal planner for Hoboken, New Jersey, he knew that the low-lying city was vulnerable to storm surge and flooding. What he did not know however, was just how imminent the risk was.

The flooded streets of Hoboken in November 2012 (photo courtesy of Flickr)

The flooded streets of Hoboken in November 2012 (photo courtesy of Flickr)

On October 29, four months after he began work, Superstorm Sandy pummeled New Jersey, bringing record-breaking storm surge and filling up the streets of Hoboken like a bathtub. Cutting off electricity for about 50,000 residents at its height, the storm also inundated over 1,700 homes and disrupted travel and transit around the city for months. Total damage was estimated above $100 million to private property, $100s of millions to the transit system and about $10 million to public facilities such as community centers, fire stations and schools.

But no impact was greater than that on the hearts and minds of Hoboken residents. Largely aware of the potential for severe flooding in the city, many citizens still never imagined how climate change would dramatically worsen and exacerbate their situation. Once Sandy hit, residents began to recognize the threat of sea level rise on their community and the storm helped instill a greater sense of urgency for action–even among newer residents like Stratton.

“A lot of conversations shifted from sustainability to resiliency,” Stratton explained. “The storm was a catalyst for action.”

The view of Lower Manhattan from Pier C Park, taken in June 2015. (Photo courtesy of Flickr)

The view of Lower Manhattan from Pier C Park, taken in June 2015. (Photo courtesy of Flickr)

For city planners like Stratton, Hoboken is “perfect mix” of a small-scale urban community. A dwarf compared to its cross-river neighbor, Hoboken’s strategic location across the Hudson River provides the best views of lower Manhattan, charming onlookers from its waterside walkways. The city’s coastal proximity, however, is both a blessing and a curse. Surrounded on the south, north and east by the Hudson, Hoboken had been exposed to flooding from rainfall, high tides and storm surge since people began settling on the land during the late 18th century. The city continued to rapidly develop, converting existing marshland into land that underlies buildings, roads and homes.

Although city officials and residents of Hoboken have been aware of the city’s vulnerabilities for centuries, flood mitigation was normally discussed only as a chronic problem that would eventually need to be fixed. For example, a 2002 North Hudson Sewerage Authority analysis showed that Hoboken’s combined sewage and stormwater drains were ill-prepared to handle flooding. The analysis recommended that the city install four pumps that would handle overflow caused by storm tides. At the time local officials, including Mayor Dawn Zimmer, hesitated to go forward with the project, citing cost concerns. Like other politicians and officials prior to Sandy, the Mayor also wanted more specific information about whether all four of the pumps would be necessary. By the time Sandy hit, only one of the four recommended pumps was installed.

“The combined sewer system in Hoboken has led to persistent flooding issues for the last 100 years,” Stratton explained. “But it’s only in the last five years have they built flood pumps.”

As temperatures, sea levels, and extreme weather events are all on the rise due to climate change, scientists and policymakers alike have emphasized the need for coastal communities to become more resilient. This means that those areas that are the most vulnerable to climate change are equipped to effectively respond in times of crisis in the short term and are better prepared to withstand these impacts in the long term.

Since Sandy, collective efforts by the city, state of New Jersey and the U.S. federal government have opened up more funding for resilience projects. For example, the Department of Housing and Urban Development launched a national resiliency competition in June 2013. The competition, known as Rebuild by Design, encouraged cities and communities affected by Superstorm Sandy to apply for federal money with project proposals specifically for recovery and rebuilding. With the help of Stratton and other city officials, Hoboken submitted a comprehensive water management strategy to the competition and was awarded $230 million a year later to support and begin implementation of the project.

Courtesy of rebuildbydesign.org

Courtesy of rebuildbydesign.org

The project, which is known as Resist, Delay, Store, Discharge, is exactly the kind of project that Stratton has committed to working on since Sandy. He defines this type of planning as promoting “adaptive capacity,” which means that it allows infrastructure and people to withstand climatic changes such as rising sea levels. As such, the project is aiming to construct flood walls to protect Hoboken’s vulnerable sites from future storm surge, install a system of parks (known as green infrastructure) to soak up water and implement pumps that will help capture and eventually discharge water back out to sea.

In addition to these greater funding and collaborative opportunities, the post-Sandy recovery has also involved conversations about the disproportionate impacts of climate change on more vulnerable populations such as low-income and minority communities. These groups are often the most impacted by climate change since they often lack adequate housing, supplies and infrastructure to effectively respond and move out of harm’s way during extreme weather events.

“Without a doubt, the disproportionate impact [of climate change] to our low-income communities is a really big issue,” explained Stratton. “We are acutely aware of our vulnerable population and our most vulnerable areas. So when we develop our strategies, we look to take care of these populations first.”

One strategy that Stratton is working on to alleviate this problem is the design and development of a microgrid that he hopes will provide uninterrupted power service during future storms. As an independent electricity network, the microgrid would link together multiple energy sources from around the city to serve as a backup generator, automatically lighting up emergency buildings in the event of a blackout. In addition to providing a reliable and resilient source of energy for city buildings, the grid will also support the city’s most vulnerable residents who may not otherwise be able to evacuate in the event of another hurricane. Working closely with federal experts from the U.S. Department of Energy and Sandia National Laboratories, Stratton hopes that the microgrid will be an essential and potentially life-saving strategy if and when another Sandy strikes.

While certainly devastating, storms like Superstorm Sandy are a hard-hitting reminder that coastal cities need to be made more resilient and better prepared for extreme weather events. But has Hoboken learned this lesson? Stratton seems to think yes and no.

“We are better prepared, but are not significantly less vulnerable,” he explained, referring to the many important initiatives and projects that are already underway.

While it is true that Hoboken has come a long way in working towards a more sustainable and resilient future, Stratton cautioned that there is a considerable time lag between the planning of these projects and their actual implementation, many of which will be implemented “over years, not months”.” To this end, Hoboken is certainly taking steps in the right direction, but the mounting challenges of climate change still pose a significant risk to the city and its residents.

The Fight to Survive: Sea Turtles in Costa Rica and Beyond

Tera with turtle

Courtesy of Tera

Courtesy of Tera

Courtesy of Tera

 

By Shivani Kuckreja

 COSTA RICASitting in the midst of the sprawling Las Baulas National Park, Tera Corinne Dornfeld begins to detail the many plights of sea turtles. As her turtle tattoo may suggest, Tera has devoted the past decade of her life to studying the decline of sea turtle populations. Now, from her small, dimly-lit room in the middle of Costa Rica, she shares her findings and explains why she is hopeful for the future of the species.

Just last year, it was estimated that 17%-22% of marine life caught annually by fishermen is discarded. In Costa Rica, alone, 15,000 sea turtles are killed annually by shrimpers. While the statistics seem bleak, Tera has faith that turtle excluder devices, or TEDs, can help decrease the number of turtles killed as by-catch. Rather than have fishermen unintentionally catch and suffocate sea turtles in their shrimp trawls, TEDs include areas in which sea turtles can escape the trawling nets. Citing the work of Sally Murphy, Dornfeld explains that the clunky TEDs are being remodeled to better suit thus to better appeal to the preferences of fishermen.

She also sees TEDs as an opportunity for the local Costan Rican communities to get involved. By encouraging local fishermen to join the discussion and voice their concerns and input, TEDs can be better designed for the average Costa Rican fisherman hoping to catch fish and shrimp—not turtles.

Not all sea turtle struggles can be solved by TEDs, however. It is sad to think that “after a long day of dodging fishing nets and nesting threats, leatherback turtles are still in danger when they are doing the most basic acts of all—looking for food”, Dornfeld states in despair. Drawing from her primary focus on leatherback turtles, she explains that the turtle’s only source of food is jellyfish, which is why it is so important that global communities—and, more locally, Costa Rican residents—address the littering of plastic bags, which leatherback turtles often mistake for jellyfish.

https://www.pinterest.com/pin/134334001358096177/

https://www.pinterest.com/pin/134334001358096177/

Acknowledging the impracticality and complexity of banning plastic bags, Dornfeld explains that the culture of Costa Rica is such that plastic bags are necessary, as trash and septic services in her area require all residents to dispose of trash in plastic bags. Maintaining hope, however, she sees an opportunity to ban the use of straws in restaurants around Costa Rica. Straws can get lodged in the noses of sea turtles, interfering with their breathing. After witnessing the pain inflicted on a sea turtle when a team tries to remove a straw from a turtle’s nose, Dornfeld is motivated to join forces with local Costan Rican communities to pick that battle in the coming months.

In addition to the threats that sea turtles face from plastics, Dornfeld also anticipates significant impacts on sea turtle populations as a result of climate change. The sex of sea turtles depends entirely on the temperature of the sand on which the eggs are laid. Within the next century, temperatures are expected to rise between 2.5 degrees Fahrenheit and 10 degrees Fahrenheit, and warmer temperatures yield female sea turtles. Being a tropical area, Costa Rica is especially vulnerable to the impacts of climate change. By 2050, the country’s temperatures are expected to increase by 2 degrees Celsius; by 2100, 4 degrees Celsius.

In the short-term, the number of female sea turtles are expected to rise significantly, eventually leading to a drop in overall sea turtle populations due to the absence of male sea turtles. In extreme cases of increased temperatures or decreased rain, such as what may occur in Costa Rica, many sea turtles could die.

Costa Ricans were estimated to emit only 7 million metric tons of CO2 in 2012, in comparison to the 36 gigatonnes of global emissions in 2012, but it is Costa Rican communities that will experience the severity of climate change. For the sake of under-resourced areas like Costa Rica, that have low carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions yet bear a large burden of the affects of CO2 emissions, it is imperative that countries around the world, especially developed countries, work to decrease their climate change-causing emissions, as the responsibility should not fall exclusively upon Costa Rica and similar countries.

Decreases in global CO2 emissions are imperative because Costa Rica’s economy depends heavily on tourism. Since the early 2000s, travel and ecotourism in Costa Rica has decreased, originally contributing 6.5% of Costa Rica’s GDP but declining to 4.5% of Costa Rica’s GDP by 2014. At the same time, the leatherback sea turtle population within Costa Rica has declined by over 90% since 1980, and will only further decline as climate change continues to impact our planet.

While sea turtle populations are facing incredible setbacks today, Dornfeld remains encouraged by the fact that sea turtles are an umbrella species for conservation: “When you protect sea turtles, you are protecting all other plants and animals in and around the ocean.” For starters, green sea turtles’ grazing helps maintain sea grass beds, which serve as breeding grounds for many sea creatures including fish and crustaceans. Furthermore, the unhatched sea turtles along the nesting habitat provide nutrients to dune vegetation, and stronger dune vegetation helps protect the beach from erosion.

Focusing her efforts on the powers of small-scale sea turtle conservation projects, Dornfeld looks forward to working with local communities to help ensure that sea turtles get back up on their flippers. She is also interested in learning more about how women can take time away from performing the traditional duties of a housewife to become involved in these small-scale projects. “What is possible to achieve through social science?” she asks, time and again throughout our conversation. “What needs to happen for people to drop everything and help the sea turtles?”