The Grass Isn’t Always Greener (even if it’s artificial turf)

Turf grass almost spoiled my Thanksgiving. Allow me to explain.

I drove to my grandma’s New York City apartment this Thanksgiving expecting to eat my favorite vegan loaf and watch my uncles drink one-too-many glasses of red wine. Instead, I found myself engaged in a dynamic conversation with my cousin about turf versus grass lawns. 

It all began with dessert. This Thanksgiving, my aunt dished out more than apple pie; she also dished out her excitement about the turf she recently installed to replace the grass in her backyard. 

My cousin was all in, responding quickly saying “That’s great! Turf is so much more environmentally beneficial than grass.” I answered defensively, arguing “That is so not true.” We went back and forth for who knows how long. It had never taken me this long to finish one slice of apple pie. 

My aunt, who is among the lucky few with a backyard in Manhattan, replaced her grass lawn with turf when she realized she could have the perfect lawn without the maintenance. With turf, my cousin asserted, you don’t use water or pesticides. 

Turf champions have been making these same arguments for a decade. Among other things, they see turf lawns as a way to fight drought, lower maintenance costs, and eliminate pesticide usage.

Pausing mid-bite, I panicked, suddenly doubting myself. My cousin had a point, grass lawns are far from perfect. But even grass provides greater benefits than turf, right?  I was right, right?

Despite my cousin’s enthusiasm for turf lawns, I countered her arguments with the concerns that environmental scientists and landscape architects have long raised. 

In case you ever need to engage in the contentious grass versus turf debate at your Thanksgiving table, here are four things you need to know:

  1. Turf is not alive. Nothing lives in turf. Grass and soil, however, is alive, home to beneficial bacteria, microbes, insects, and more.
  2. Turf affects runoff. Made mostly of petroleum-based plastic products, turf confines heat during the day and traps it through the night, causing runoff water to leave turf hotter than it would grass, a harmful condition for aquatic ecosystems. 
  3. Turf is not biodegradable. Following its average lifespan of 15 years, turf ends up in a landfill. 
  4. Turf won’t stay green forever. Not only does turf come with a plethora of environmental problems, it also carries aesthetic issues. In other words, even your maintenance- free, green, neatly trimmed turf will turn yellow with time.  Just wait.

Grass lawns are not environmentally beneficial, but turf grass provides even fewer environmental benefits.

My last bite of apple pie would have been just a little bit sweeter had I been able to make this argument Thanksgiving night. But now, I am ready for that next family meal.

The American Lawn: A Harmful Invention

While I sat on my front porch impatiently waiting for my coffee to cool, our nextdoor neighbor turned on his lawnmower. Then, like clockwork, the neighbor across the street also brought out a lawnmower. Soon after, I watched as two men got out of a van labeled “Mike’s Lawns” and began mowing someone else’s lawn. 

But the problem with lawns is far more than just noisy lawnmowers. Subject to a third of all residential water use in the U.S., lawns strike me as impractical, unused spaces that carry no productive value. The non-native grass saturated in herbicides pollutes our air and water. Lawns are bad for the environment; this we know to be true. 

But the problem with lawns runs deeper yet. Even these boxes of seemingly harmless, perfectly manicured, velvet green boxes sitting purposeless in front of homes, carry legacies that cannot be de-historicized nor depoliticized. 

Rooted in colonialism, racism, and classism, lawns serve as status symbols. Like theatre, lawns are meticulously crafted to create a designed, controlled, and safe experience that mimics—in this case—nature, or so we think. The harmful association between grass and healthy, beneficial “nature” ignores all that is wrong with lawns (including sprinklers, lawn mowers, pesticides, etc), especially from an ecological perspective. 

To Andrew Jackson Downing’s 1841 landscape-gardening book, a town over from mine, Hartford, CT, might feel foreign from Downing’s home with a nursery in New York, (which, by the way is a state the same size as all of the lawns in the U.S.) but climate change “carries no passport and knows no borders.” 

The effects of front lawns in America have and will continue to have global impacts that exist beyond your white picket fence. In Hartford, CT, where the white picket fences and manicured lawns of the suburbs give way to unkept public parks and parking lots, signs of climate change are ever-present.  Continue reading