Monthly Archives: April 2014

Kate Konschnik: Fracking’s Middle Ground Warrior

If you’ve heard about “fracking” for natural gas and oil in the United States, you’ve probably heard one of two stories:

The first is a story of clean energy and US energy independence. Natural gas burns cleaner than coal and emits less CO2, making it useful in combating climate change. As a result of increased fracking in the past several years, natural gas now represents 30% of US energy supplies. This means that less US energy is coming from coal. Additionally, producing this energy within the US will decrease dependence on foreign oil.

The second story is one of yet another dirty, unregulated industry harming people and the environment. Mismanaged wastewater, along with chemical spills and leaks, are polluting groundwater. Fracking companies do not have to disclose the hazardous, carcinogenic chemicals they are using. And fracking releases large amounts of methane and other air pollutants that negatively impact both human health and climate change.

So which of these stories is right? According to Kate Konschnik, policy director for Harvard’s Environmental Law program, neither represents the whole truth. Konschnik believes natural gas is an important part of the US energy sector, but also recognizes that acquiring it poses real risks that must be managed. It is, Konschnik says, “a place where law needs to play catch-up, where law doesn’t quite know how to be applied.” Despite how contentious the topic of fracking has become, Konschnik believes a middle ground position, best found through well-made and managed laws, is both possible and necessary.

Continue reading Kate Konschnik: Fracking’s Middle Ground Warrior

The G8 New Alliance for Food Security and Nutrition: Cooperative Investment or Colonialism in Disguise?

Foreign aid for Africa is taking new form as private investment from both foreign and local agribusinesses. Why this could be a game-changer for many commercial smallholder farmers, but why they must also remain vigilant.

 

In the 2012 G8 Summit held at Camp David, newly re-elected President Obama proposed a new plan to lift 50 million people out of poverty by 2022. In conjunction with the African Union and Grow Africa, the New Alliance for Food Security and Nutrition Initiative provided a framework for opening up African agriculture to foreign investment, infusing a crippled system with private capital and, as a result, bolstering food security in the region. This policy has, however, come under heavy fire from many environmental NGOs and local African organizations. Their fear is that this wave of private investment is just neo-colonialism in disguise. Continue reading The G8 New Alliance for Food Security and Nutrition: Cooperative Investment or Colonialism in Disguise?

Jonathan Waterman: Wilderness’ Voice

www.nationalgeographic.com
www.nationalgeographic.com

Jonathan Waterman recalls that his interest in the Colorado River began shortly before 2008 when he discovered that the well water on his property could not be used to water his vegetable garden, let alone any other outdoor needs. After 25 years of living high in the Rocky Mountains in Colorado near the headwaters of the great river itself, he discovered that people downstream owned the water on his property, which meant he was not allowed to use it for his own purposes. Shortly after realizing that this was an issue Waterman read an article in the New York Times magazine talking about the glum future of the Colorado. He explained, with a quick laugh during our FaceTime interview, how these discoveries spurred him to “plunge right into action.” Continue reading Jonathan Waterman: Wilderness’ Voice

UN Millennium Development Targets for Water Will Expire in 2015. So What’s Next?

Every year, more people die from water-related illness than all forms of violence combined. Polluted water is deadly, and it is the poor in developing countries, and children in particular, that suffer most from unclean water and inadequate sanitation.

In Ethiopia, more than 60 percent of the population lacks access to clean drinking water. Most Ethiopians must therefore buy expensive water from private vendors, or collect water from untreated sources, putting them at risk of contracting life-threatening diseases like cholera and typhoid.

We have the know-how to solve these water challenges and save millions of lives. What’s needed is global political will and public pressure for clean water infrastructure. Fortunately, world leaders have a vital opportunity to transform the global water policy agenda with the expiration of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) next year.

In 2000, world leaders committed to halving the number of people without access to safe drinking water and basic sanitation through the MDGs. Although this target has been achieved — more than 2 billion people have gained access to improved drinking water since 1990 — 1.1 billion people still live without clean drinking water and 2.5 billion people lack basic sanitation. Furthermore, the MDGs have failed to bring clean water to the poorest countries. While millions in Latin America, Asia, and the Pacific have gained access to clean water in recent years, Sub-Saharan Africa has been left behind. Today, over 40 percent of all people that lack access to clean drinking water live in Sub-Saharan Africa.

The privatization of water supplies is partially responsible for Sub-Saharan Africa’s lack of progress on the MDG for water and sanitation. Although the UN Task Force on the MDGs has avoided taking a firm position on privatization, the UN has given the World Bank and other major donors the authority to finance water projects in developing nations. The World Bank avidly promotes water privatization in Sub-Saharan Africa as a means of meeting water-related MDGs. The World Bank invests directly in corporate water giants like Biwater and Suez, which have been behind failed privatizations in Tanzania, South Africa, and other countries. These companies use the rhetoric of the MDGs to justify private sector involvement in water services, even while they prioritize profit and shareholder interests over affordable water access.

Private sector involvement in the supply of water in Sub-Saharan Africa is problematic because it has failed to extend clean, affordable water infrastructure to the poor. For instance, when the city government of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania handed its water system over to Biwater, many Tanzanians experienced soaring water bills and mass disconnections from the network. Rather than paying high prices for water that had previously been provided for free, many low-income families instead decided to consume contaminated well water. Thus, water privatization can be financially crippling and life-threatening for the urban poor of Sub-Saharan Africa. While there is a role for international financial institutions and the private sector in the fight for clean water, there is no justification for international agencies and corporations to continue promoting water privatization.

With the expiration of the MDGs in 2015, world leaders have the power to create a new set of water policies that prioritizes extending clean, affordable water to the poor. In place of the current MDGs, new action-oriented Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are being drafted as part of the UN’s Post-2015 Development Agenda. The SDGs have the potential to address many of the shortcomings of the MDGs, such as their neglect of the poorest countries and most excluded people, especially in Sub-Saharan Africa.

The dire need for better access to clean water and sanitation is an important part of the SDGs discussion. The SDGs Open Working Group has identified water and sanitation as potential focus areas for the SDGs, and has outlined actions such as expanding wastewater treatment infrastructure, and ensuring safe access to safe and affordable drinking water for all. However, in its most recent proposal for the SDGs, the Open Working Group included a provision for greater involvement of the private sector in the implementation of the SDGs. This agenda is shared by the World Bank, which, as the largest external source of financing for water projects around the world, will have a big say in the creation of a new SDG for water. But it’s critical that the world’s poor have an even bigger say in the water policies that will affect their livelihoods and their health.

Under the current MDGs, corporate-driven, World Bank-backed water projects are allowed to prioritize profit over people’s needs for access. But water management must be returned to public hands, democratically accountable to the people whose interests are at stake. Around the world, public investment and management has been proven to be a more successful model for developing water delivery systems than privatization. And although financial institutions like the World Bank are big and powerful, it’s possible to change their agendas. One organization, Corporate Accountability International, is already at the front lines, challenging corporate abuse of water, forging alliances with grassroots water organizations abroad, and working with legislators to challenge the World Bank’s water policy.

The post-2015 SDGs are a major chance for world leaders, the UN, and the World Bank to join this fight for the human right to water and advocate for democratically controlled public water systems in developing nations. By enshrining support for human rights and publicly controlled water systems in the new SDGs, we can ensure that the needs of the poor are prioritized over corporate interests and the agendas of financial institutions like the World Bank.

The UN General Assembly will meet to discuss the first draft of the Open Working Group’s SDGs in September, so there’s still plenty of time for you to voice your support for public water policy in the nations that need it most.

What you can do:

1. Ensure that increasing access to clean water and sanitation is made a top priority in the SDGs.

Take the MY World survey and vote for clean water and sanitation to become a priority for the SDGs.

2. Tell your elected officials to pressure the World Bank to stop directly funding water corporations and instead implement SDGs that support publicly controlled water systems.

3. Join the global conversation on Twitter and Facebook.

Beyond Water Privatization: Deconstructing the Public-Private Binary and Considering Alternatives

privatizingWater1

A Review of Privatizing Water: Governance Failure and the World’s Urban Water Crisis by Karen Bakker. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2010.

In January of 2000, protests broke out in Cochabamba, Bolivia, in response to the skyrocketing price of water. Citizens saw their water bills triple or quadruple just weeks after the municipal water supply was handed over to a private company. Millions of poor city residents went on strike, shutting down Cochabamba for four days. The protesters called for universal water rights, using slogans like “Water Is God’s Gift and Not A Merchandise,” and eventually succeeded in forcing the government to revoke its hated legislation.

The Cochabamba protests are part of a global campaign for a human right to water. Vandana Shiva, a vocal opponent of water privatization, has said that “buying and selling [water] for profit … denies the poor of their human rights.” Conversely, institutions like the World Bank and International Monetary Fund have vigorously urged developing nations to privatize, asserting that market strategies can most efficiently extend water to the poor and ensure water conservation. The introduction of private management to the water sector during the past two decades has generated fierce, polarizing controversies worldwide. Continue reading Beyond Water Privatization: Deconstructing the Public-Private Binary and Considering Alternatives

Be a part of restoring the Colorado River Delta

RaisetheRiver
raisetheriver.org

High up in the Rocky Mountains is the starting point of the Colorado River. For six million years, up until 1960, it cascaded through the southwestern landscape for 1,500 miles before reaching the sea. But the construction of some forty dams siphoning water away from the river and a demand increase in the region, the Colorado no longer makes it to its final destination: the Colorado River Delta in Mexico. The delta is left dry and cracking in the heat of the sun, stripped of its lush habitats and wildlife. This is how it has remained for decades, until four days ago.

On March 23, the Morelos Dam was opened allowing a “pulse flow” of water to begin the historic 70-mile journey down the bone dry Colorado River Delta to the Sea of Cortez, reconnecting the river and the ocean for the first time in forty years. Continue reading Be a part of restoring the Colorado River Delta

Fracking in Pennsylvania: A Personal and Regulatory Nightmare

A Review of Tom Wilber’s  Under the Surface: Fracking, Fortunes, and the Fate of the Marcellus Shale

“The landowners want the money, and I understand that. We all want the money. But gee, we’d like to have fish in our pond.” These words from Ken Ely, a resident of Dimock, Pennsylvania, came soon after natural gas production began on his land. While at first optimistic about his economic prospects that could result from fracking for this increasingly important source of energy, Ken soon became concerned when Cabot, the oil and gas company who owned and operated the fracking wells, began storing untreated wastewater on his land. Continue reading Fracking in Pennsylvania: A Personal and Regulatory Nightmare