The early years of the nineteenth century saw Britain assume a leadership role in newly industrialized global economy. The mills of Lancashire represented a hub for international manufacturing and trade, whose factories “[…] received from visitors some of the respect due to the temples of a great religion,” as described by author Norman Longmate. The impact of the First Industrial Revolution was clear, as the early industrialization allowed British firms to seize their opportunity and assert dominance. This leading position would continue for the first half of the nineteenth century, until disaster struck in mid-1861.
Despite international political and economic predominance in the global system, the “Cotton Famine” instigated by the American Civil War revealed what would become the industry’s growing weakness. In January of 1861, The Times warned of over-reliance as, “Our position is becoming unsafe in the extreme. We are holding on by a single anchor, and the strands of the cable are seen actually parting.” The Northern blockade of Southern ports starved international markets for raw materials, and aggravated political tensions as the British government refused to get involved. The strict neutrality of British political leadership frustrated both the North and the South, and also prevented government support from reaching the stricken mills. With large swaths of the working population cut down to part-time or sitting idle, poverty relief was desperately needed throughout the region and largely drawn from private organizations. The manipulation of international trade by the Union government effectively demonstrated the absolute reliance of British textile industry on truly free trade.
Foreshadowed by the Famine of 1861, the early decades of the twentieth century and the accompanying trends in international economics spelled the end for Lancashire’s manufacturing domination. The increasing movement toward protectionism proved detrimental to the textile producers, despite advocacy by many manufacturing sectors. The reliance on imported raw materials meant an international order dominated by competing tariff barriers erected expensive obstacles. With an ever-decreasing market, the final blow to Lancashire came with India’s textile boycott of the early 1930s. Having lost the competitive technical advantage over the later half of the nineteenth century and unable to support the rising cost, British textile manufacturing slipped from its central position and cleared the way for rising markets.