-
Recent Posts
- Running for Science: Science for Running – The Complete Series
- Boston Marathon Training Update, new podcasts
- Cleveland-bound! (Annual meetings of the American Association of Physical Anthropology, aka AAPAs)
- Running for Science:Science for Running – Episode 3, Hips Don’t Lie (Anna Warrener)
- Running for Science: Science for Running – Episode 2, From Our Feet Up (Cody Prang)
- Running for Science: Science for Running – Episode 1, You Have to Walk Before You Can Run (Jeremy DeSilva)
- Three papers: January 13-19, 2019
- The beginning of the journey: Training update, January 18
Categories
Archives
- May 2019
- March 2019
- January 2019
- January 2017
- February 2016
- October 2015
- September 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- June 2014
- January 2014
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
Blogroll
The Pleistocene Scene – A.P. Van Arsdale BlogMeta
Tag Archives: DNA identification
Maryland v. King: Another step towards a DNA age
I am not a legal expert. What follows is in no way intended to be a legal exegesis of the arguments at stake in the recently decided Maryland v King supreme court case. However, I do know something about genomics … Continue reading
Posted in Genetics
Tagged DNA identification, legal anthropology, Maryland v King, personal genomics, SCOTUS
Comments Off on Maryland v. King: Another step towards a DNA age
DNA is not “the 21st century fingerprint”
SCOTUSblog has a great recap of oral arguments this week at the Supreme Court in the case of Maryland v King (docket 12-207). At issue is whether or not the state, in this case the Maryland police, have the right … Continue reading
Posted in Genetics
Tagged DNA identification, forensic anthropology, genomic law, legal anthropology, Maryland v King
Comments Off on DNA is not “the 21st century fingerprint”