Paul Bettany’s Chaucer Isn’t Too Pop Culture, Or Why A Knight’s Tale Deserves Academic Love

Breaking my own rule of never watching a film adaptation before reading its source text, I watched Brian Helgeland’s A Knight’s Tale long before I read Chaucer’s The Knight’s Tale.  In my defence, I had forgotten much of the film’s content by the time I got around to reading the Canterbury Tales, and I hope to demonstrate that it would not have mattered if I did.  Now that I have re-watched the 2001 motion picture as a medieval literature student and a screenwriter with a particular penchant for adaptations, I have recognised an unexpected medieval-ness behind Helgeland’s boldly modern text, and I have re-weighed the efficacy of transmission of medieval literature through popular culture.
If you have not heard of or deigned to watch A Knight’s Tale, here is the official trailer:
Either way, I hope you will read on as I grapple with a) Helgeland’s anachronistic and “generic translation [that turns] high culture into popular culture” (Forni 254); b) the accepted view of popular culture as low culture; and c) our tradition and authority complex when it comes to medieval and medievalist texts.

From The Knight’s Tale to A Knight’s Tale

What makes a modern adaptation or reinterpretation text scholastically and artistically valid in the realm of medievalism (defined here)?  In working toward an answer, I am indebted to Louise D’Arcens and her 2008 article titled “Deconstruction and the Medieval Indefinite Article: The Undecidable Medievalism of Brian Helgeland’s A Knight’s Tale.”  She points out the significance of Helgeland’s indefinite “A” as opposed to Chaucer’s definite “The” and explains, among other things, that the film’s “undecidable medievalism” places it in a different category from, say, Peter Jackson’s strict adaptation of Lord of the Rings.  It is tempting, as a history buff or a Chaucerian or a medievalist, to watch, study, and criticise A Knight’s Tale as an adaptation of The Knight’s Tale, which almost necessarily leads one to view it as an American / capitalist / individualist / [insert any modern ideology with negative valence here] warping of the medieval period.  But these judgments rely on the a priori notion that the film’s sole intention was to create a visual adaptation of a medieval story, a medieval sport, a medieval society.  What I have gathered reading interviews with writer/director Brian Helgeland and watching the film as an admittedly childish (read: unassuming) medievalist leads me to reject that idea in favour of a more forgiving reading of the film as a medievalist text.

A Knight’s Tale is less a visual translation of and more a response to the modern that can be found in the medieval (or the medieval that can be found in the modern); it was first conceived by Brian Helgeland as a medieval sports film, and his inspiration for the film’s story stemmed from the fact that only nobles could compete in jousting tournaments (Reel 6 Interview).  Based on this tidbit, the primary “source text” for A Knight’s Tale is not, in fact, The Knight’s Tale.  The film is not an adaptation of Chaucer’s text at all (which is, by the way, a rendering of Boccaccio’s Teseida, not an original story, at least in the modern sense of the term).  Its inspiration stems from Helgeland’s fascination with the medieval sport of jousting, and its construction is based more on an ideology of cultural transmission than a strictly historical or literary tradition.  Helgeland explains Chaucer’s presence in the text, which clearly goes beyond the film’s title:

“One of the dangers of a period movie is that everything gets kind of put up on a pedestal and covered in varnish…I was an English major, and when we studied Chaucer he seemed like a guy who stepped out of a museum with dust all over him. But he had to be a more kind of out-there guy to write all that stuff. So having no idea, I’m hoping Paul [Bettany]’s version of Chaucer is closer to who Chaucer probably was…” (Contact Music)

Helgeland wanted Geoffrey “Geoff” Chaucer in his film to subvert the museum quality of the medieval period.  And for those of you who are still hoping for faithful adaptation, Helgeland did intend for his film to take place during a six-month period of Chaucer’s life for which historians have no record, which means that a) he did do his research and b) our adaptation theory can be thrown out the window.  The film’s setting and story is set in a fanciful medieval neverland, really.  Helgeland gets off the hook.

Furthermore, Brian Helgeland’s interviews reveal that a dialogue with, rather than a translation of, the medieval period was in his head for the making of A Knight’s Tale.  One interviewer remarks that “it seemed the movie was about youth and identity in some ways, and also questioning the powers that be” (Contact Music).  I would argue that this film’s subversive questioning is what makes it so delightfully medieval.  Even if you disagree, it is clear that Helgeland’s aim was to coax to the surface those medieval aspects of modern society, or to tease out the modern-seeming aspects of medieval society.  In short, the film really is easier to appreciate if one’s critical viewing considers Helgeland’s vision for the film:

“We have computers and cell phones and cars, and all that. But they had all that too, they had horses, they wrote things down — I really believe that people have never changed, really. They laugh, they fall in love, they go to war, they never change” (Interview with Marty Mapes).


Of the people, By the people, For the people 

Perhaps it’s the American in me that delighted in William, Watt, and Roland’s quest to stick it (jousting!) to the (noble)man.  Don’t we all love an underdog story?  The short answer: not if it gets too close to beloved literature and literary figures.  The long answer: not when it propagates “the pervasive, and ostensibly insurmountable, chasm between the popular and the academic Chaucer” and “transform[s] a Boethian exploration of human happiness and divine justice into a predictable and vulgar myth of fulfilment” (Forni 254); and certainly not when it “refus[es] to acknowledge the nature and mannerisms of social customs and people in Europe at the time” (Jeffrey Badder).  In defense of the first complaint, Kathleen Forni does make an astute observation.  She argues that A Knight’s Tale denotes the modern reception of Chaucer as a figure for popular culture (as opposed to Shakespeare’s popularity with intellectuals) (Forni 262).  While I agree that Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales lends itself well to the modern storyteller who might wish to create a comic, pop culture-y text set in the medieval period, I do not necessarily think that we should lament it.  After all, even Shakespeare wrote for the masses–the foundlings occupying the standing space in theatres were part of the Bard’s carefully aimed double entendres and satire.  And the modern conception of popular culture–having much to do with mass printing–does not really fit in Chaucer’s time.  This brings me to Forni’s second point.

As I noted earlier, Brian Helgeland clearly did not have an adaptation of Chaucer’s Knight’s Tale in mind when he set out to write A Knight’s Tale. He had jousting, 70s rock, and the philosophy that a man can change his stars guiding his script.  He was writing a tale about a knight, not the tale about the knight, as  Louise D’Arcens articulates in her argument.  He is not trying to recreate Chaucer’s “Boethian exploration of human happinessand divine justice,” so we certainly cannot hold his film to that standard.  Consequently, I cannot agree with Forni’s judgment on A Knight’s Tale on the grounds that her arguments are supported by assumptions that simply cannot be applied to Helgeland’s film.  Furthermore, she does not consider the film’s genre, or the fact that film is meant to be massively consumed and is closely bound up with “popular culture,” which she seems to think is a dismantling of Chaucer’s image as the classy father of English poetry. A Knight’s Tale is irreverent, maybe, but so is the Canterbury Tales. A Knight’s Tale is a comedy, a kind of modern tribute to the medieval sport of jousting.  (All criticism I read about the film did allow that the cinematography of the actual jousting is phenomenal.)  So why can we not appreciate A Knight’s Tale for what it is?


Our Obsession with Lineage: A Pristine Medieval Period

Brian Helgeland’s A Knight’s Tale subverts textual authority in a way that especially bother medievalists.  Whether it is with Queen’s “We Will Rock You” or Jocelyn’s failure to conform to our ideas of a medieval noblewoman, Helgeland defies expectations anyone might draw from the title of the film, its inclusion of Geoffrey Chaucer, or its medieval setting.  Is it, then, the feeling of being duped that upsets the likes of Jeffrey Badder and Kathleen Forni?

The former’s tone of disappointment as he describes the opening scene certainly points to the frustration of expectation:

“The crowd “does the wave” as at a modern baseball stadium, competitors pump their breastplates like football players, and the nobles, apparently fans of 1970’s rock-and-roll, sing along to the theme music; the guitar solo, in fact, is even timed to appear as though it comes from the trumpet players on the tournament grounds” (Jeffrey Badder).

The opening of A Knight’s Tale reminds me of scenes in Shrek where 90s pop music rules the fairytale land.  No one seems to be bothered by it, perhaps because Shrek is acknowledged as a fairytale; it is animated.  Although A Knight’s Tale does pull the rug out from under those of us who come in to the film expecting a historically accurate adaptation of Chaucer’s first Canterbury Tale, I would argue that the film is straightforward and honest about its fairytale quality from the beginning.

I am inclined also to view the medieval scholar’s discomfort with A Knight’s Tale as a manifestation of our obsession with tradition and lineage and of our tendency to view historical figures such as Chaucer and historical cultures as pristine and sacred (in that they should be preserved and studied rather than embodied, filtered, and transmitted in a modern hand).  After all, the notions of textual tradition and authority have existed at least since Chaucer’s lifetime; in Troilus and Criseyde, for example, he probably invented a classical textual source for his story, crediting a “Lollius” whose name only appears in the Chaucer’s text.  What’s more, Chaucer and other medieval writers freely borrowed, innovated, and plucked pieces from other texts while modern authors are governed by not only copyrights protecting intellectual property and reverence for the past, including its literary figures.  This creates a standard for film adaptations that is creatively restrictive.  While there is something to be said for strict adaptations, the strength of Brian Helgeland’s comic and epic tale is in its humour and its apparently modern view that “a man can change his stars.”


Conclusions

“If we are to truly grasp the significance of a medievalist text within the undecidability of medievalism, we need to accept, and not condemn, its partial truth, its blithe purloining, and most of all its fluctuating allegiances, which it directs promiscuously not only to the medieval past, but also to other…pasts, the present, and even the future” (D’Arcens 98).

Louise D’Arcens’s conclusion resonates with my experience watching A Knight’s Tale for the second time (the first time as a medievalist).  It was marked by delight and recognition of unexpected medieval elements.  I anticipated a quirky medieval-esque comedy, so I was pleasantly surprised whenever Helgeland dropped gems like the importance of pilgrimage (in Chaucer’s introductions of Will as Sir Ulrich).  And although steeped in modern ideology, I recognised Helgeland’s construction of an estates satire within the template of Hollywood’s cathartic good vs. evil plotline: The priest, for example, is shushed by the fiery Jocelyn as tries to silence her in his cathedral.  Geoff Chaucer calls attention to the class divide at tournaments and pokes fun at the noble class by addressing “everybody else here not sitting on a cushion” when he introduces Sir Ulrich.  And unredeemable baddie Count Adhemar is thoroughly shown to be as ignoble in manner as Will is in blood.

My viewing of the film was consquently enriched by my determination to watch it as a product of its time and as in dialogue with, rather than necessarily deriving from, a bygone time and culture that continues to intrigue modern society.  As scholars and film-viewers, we can learn something from such a reading of Helgeland’s text: taking a break from the traditional criticism of medievalist texts is beneficial, for both academic inquiry and cinematic pleasure.

Works Cited:
D’Arcens, Louise. “Deconstruction and the Medieval Indefinite Article: The Undecidable Medievalism of Brian Helgeland’s A Knight’s Tale” in Parergon, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 88-98. Australian and New Zealand Association of Medieval and Early Modern Studies, 2008. Article. Web. 31 March 2016.
Forni, Kathleen. “Reinventing Chaucer: Helgeland’s A Knight’s Tale” in The Chaucer Review, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 253-264. Penn State University Press, 2003. Article. Web. 31 March 2016.

 

1,642 thoughts on “Paul Bettany’s Chaucer Isn’t Too Pop Culture, Or Why A Knight’s Tale Deserves Academic Love

  1. Impressive web site, Distinguished feedback that I can tackle. Im moving forward and may apply to my current job as a pet sitter, which is very enjoyable, but I need to additional expand. Regards. dewacash link alternatif

  2. 안산출장마사지 서비스는 24시간 연중무휴로 운영되어 시간 제약 없이 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다. 늦은 밤 호텔에 도착한 출장객이나 새벽에 피로를 느끼는 안산출장마사지

  3. A very awesome blog post. We are really grateful for your blog post. You will find a lot of approaches after visiting your post. I was exactly searching for. Thanks for such post and please keep it up. Great work sutra88

  4. A very awesome blog post. We are really grateful for your blog post. You will find a lot of approaches after visiting your post. I was exactly searching for. Thanks for such post and please keep it up. Great work

  5. This content is written very well. Your use of formatting when making your points makes your observations very clear and easy to understand. Thank you. dominobet login

  6. This type of message always inspiring and I prefer to read quality content, so happy to find good place to many here in the post, the writing is just great, thanks for the post. Baccarat

  7. Fine way of describing, and pleasant post to get data regarding my presentation focus, which i am going to deliver in college.

    Feel free to visit my web-site loan calculator emi

  8. Nice post. I was checking constantly this blog and I’m impressed!
    Extremely helpful info particularly the last part 🙂 I care for such
    info much. I was seeking this particular information for a very long
    time. Thank you and best of luck.

    My web site – savastan0. cc

  9. The other day, while I was at work, my sister stole my iPad and tested to see if
    it can survive a 40 foot drop, just so she can be a youtube sensation. My apple ipad is now destroyed and she has 83 views.

    I know this is totally off topic but I had to share
    it with someone!

    My website :: thabet

  10. Thank you for the good writeup. It in truth was a amusement account it.

    Look complex to more brought agreeable from you! By the way, how could we keep up a correspondence?

    Here is my webpage :: website

  11. Only aspire to mention ones content can be as incredible. This clarity with your post is superb and that i may think you’re a guru for this issue. High-quality along with your concur permit me to to seize your current give to keep modified by using approaching blog post. Thanks a lot hundreds of along with you should go on the pleasurable get the job done. togel online

  12. I think this is a really good article. You make this information interesting and engaging. You give readers a lot to think about and I appreciate that kind of writing. parlay bola

  13. This is my first time go to see at here and i am genuinely happy to
    read all at single place.

    Also visit my web page :: kkwin

  14. In this posting fully grasp the most important thing, the product offers you some sort of key word loaded web page link an incredible practical web page webpage: ayamtoto

  15. I get pleasure from that superb write-up that you’ve got presented for people like us. When i reassure this will possibly be necessary for the majority of people. ayamtoto slot

  16. excellent publish, very informative. I’m wondering why
    the other specialists of this sector do not understand
    this. You should proceed your writing. I am sure, you’ve
    a huge readers’ base already!

    my web page auto locksmiths consett

  17. It’s going to be end of mine day, except before finish I am reading this enormous piece of
    writing to increase my experience.

    Feel free to visit my web site … au88

  18. After I originally commented I seem to have clicked the -Notify me when new comments are added-
    checkbox and now every time a comment is added I recieve 4 emails with the same
    comment. Is there an easy method you are able to remove me from that service?

    Many thanks!

    My page :: u888. com

  19. With havin so much content do you ever run into any issues of plagorism or copyright
    infringement? My site has a lot of completely unique content I’ve either authored myself or outsourced but it appears a lot of
    it is popping it up all over the internet without my agreement.
    Do you know any solutions to help protect against content
    from being ripped off? I’d really appreciate it.

    Also visit my page; đăng ký 8xbet

  20. Wonderful article! This is the type of information that are meant to be shared across
    The Gaslight District net.
    Disgrace on Google for now not positioning this submit upper!
    Come on over and talk over with my website . Thank you =)

  21. An impressive share! I’ve just forwarded this onto
    a coworker who has been conducting a little research on this.
    And he actually bought me lunch simply because I stumbled upon it for him…
    lol. So let me reword this…. Thanks for the
    meal!! But yeah, thanx for spending the time to discuss
    this issue here on your web page.

    Have a look at my site :: 68gamebai trang chủ

  22. ข้อมูลดูอัปเดตดี ไม่เก่า อ่านแล้วเข้าใจง่าย ผมนึกถึง God55

  23. Saya baru saja mengikuti dengan seksama artikel ini dari awal hingga akhir, dan menurut saya pembahasannya
    sangat menarik, apalagi ketika topik-topik populer seperti KUBET, Situs Judi Bola Terlengkap, Situs
    Parlay Resmi, Situs Parlay Gacor, Situs Mix Parlay, Situs Judi Bola, toto macau, kubet login,
    situs parlay, Kubet Parlay, dan Judi Bola gacor diulas dengan sudut pandang yang kuat dan mudah dipahami.
    Menurut saya pribadi, tulisan ini memberikan penjelasan yang jelas dan terarah, sehingga
    pembaca dapat mengikuti seluruh alur penjelasan dengan nyaman. Saya juga menyukai bagaimana
    penulis menyajikan isi artikel dengan gaya penyampaian yang tertata, sehingga
    tidak membingungkan meski topiknya cukup luas. Selain itu,
    artikel ini juga memberikan perspektif yang lebih luas dibandingkan banyak tulisan lain yang pernah saya baca sebelumnya dalam kategori yang sama.
    Saya merasa perlu meninggalkan komentar karena artikel ini benar-benar tampak disiapkan dengan baik dan layak mendapatkan apresiasi.
    Saya berharap penulis dapat terus menyajikan artikel-artikel
    yang informasiif seperti ini agar semakin banyak pembaca
    yang memperoleh wawasan baru dari sudut pandang yang terpercaya.
    Terima kasih kepada penulis yang telah memberikan materi dengan kualitas yang sangat baik, sehingga pengalaman membaca menjadi jauh lebih menyenangkan dan penuh informasi.

  24. Have you ever considered publishing an e-book or guest authoring on other sites?
    I have a blog centered on the same subjects you discuss and would love
    to have you share some stories/information. I know my viewers would value your work.
    If you’re even remotely interested, feel free to send me an e mail.

    Also visit my web blog Sonara jobs USA full time

  25. What’s up, after reading this amazing article i
    am as well happy to share my experience here with colleagues.

    Feel free to visit my page – link 68gamebai

  26. Hello! Do you know if they make any plugins to safeguard against hackers?
    I’m kinda paranoid about losing everything I’ve worked hard on. Any recommendations?

    Also visit my blog post https://zzxegu.za.com/

  27. Greetings from California! I’m bored at work so I decided to browse your
    website on my iphone during lunch break. I love the knowledge you provide here and can’t wait
    to take a look when I get home. I’m shocked at how fast your blog loaded
    on my cell phone .. I’m not even using WIFI, just 3G ..
    Anyhow, fantastic blog!

    Here is my blog post: bitly login

  28. The new Zune browser is surprisingly good, but not as good as the iPod’s. It works well, but isn’t as fast as Safari, and has a clunkier interface. If you occasionally plan on using the web browser that’s not an issue, but if you’re planning to browse the web alot from your PMP then the iPod’s larger screen and better browser may be important. fox888สมัคร

Leave a Reply to Harriet Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Skip to toolbar