Transforming Black Lives in the Mississippi Delta

Chandra Williams in the Crossroads Cultural Arts Center. Photo by Ashley Funk

Chandra Williams in the Crossroads Cultural Arts Center. Photo by Ashley Funk

Hot, dry air whips in through the open windows of the speeding car, while fields of white expand past both sides of the highway. On the radio, another Blues song plays, and the histories of these fields come to life.

The Blues grew out of these cotton fields of the Mississippi Delta. As a means of resistance against the brutality they faced, African slaves would sing their broken histories and chant their pain. Here, in Clarksdale, Mississippi– known as the birthplace of the Blues– these legacies of oppression and resistance are very much alive. Every year, tourists flock to Clarksdale to celebrate the history of the Blues, enjoy the community’s endless hospitality, and taste its Southern cuisine. Yet, over 40 percent of the community lives below the US poverty line. Breaking down this statistic, nearly half of Clarksdale’s black residents live in poverty, compared to just over 10 percent of white residents.

Soon, the fields recede to the white-picket fences and mansions which line the grounds of the country club and golf course. A few miles further into central Clarksdale, families living in small, dilapidated wooden houses can barely afford electricity. Driving into Clarksdale, the divides between rich and poor, white and black, are obvious.

While it’s easy for some to harbor on Clarksdale’s struggles, Chandra Williams sees the city in a different way: “This could be a healing mecca,” she says confidently. Chandra is the visionary director of the newly formed Crossroads Cultural Arts Center (CCAC). Although Chandra recently moved to Clarksdale for the position, she has called Mississippi home for the past 15 years. As a talented artist and educator, she is passionate about using the arts as a force for healing communities and individuals. Her business card reads “Teacher of Transformation”.

Before her position at the CCAC, Chandra taught art for nearly a decade through the Brilliant Easel Art School, which she founded. Through the school, Chandra worked with Mississippi public schools and mental health facilities to empower individuals, primarily youth, through the arts. Chandra sees art as a way for individuals to connect with themselves, their cultures, and their natural world. In addition to her degrees in drawing, printmaking, and education in informal settings, Chandra has a certification through the Audubon Society in wetlands education. She uses these experiences to ground her work in transforming individuals and communities, and hopes to continue to do the same through the CCAC.

From the outside, the CCAC looks like an uninhabited warehouse. It fits right into the rest of town where run-down buildings are supposed to add to Clarksdale’s charm. But on the inside, the CCAC is an arena of endless potential, with wide-open rooms, a stage, and beautifully painted murals hiding behind every door. Chandra dreams of making the CCAC a space where people can heal through arts rooted in history, culture, and community.

Specifically, Chandra wants to use the CCAC to transform the way black Americans see themselves and their culture. “We’re suffering from an identity crisis,” she explains as she tells the story of a young man she knew who committed a crime and served time in prison, just because he thought that was the only way he could be a rapper.

One of Chandra’s guiding life philosophies is that art creates reality. “Art is made for our senses. The image or sound that we sense creates a thought in our mind, and that thought drives what we think is reality,” she says. Right now, one of the dominant realities being created by art, specifically music, links young black men to crime and violence. “The black image needs to be changed for ourselves, for everyone, especially for black boys,” Chandra explains, “Lives are depending on it.” Here, in Clarksdale, where violent crime rates are more than double the US average, her message rings clear.

To Chandra, the natural environment plays an essential role in restoring identity and grounding the arts, especially in the rural community of Clarksdale. “In society, there’s inequality, but in nature, everyone is equally powerful,” she says. “But before I came to Mississippi at 22 years old, I had never seen the uninterrupted earth.”

To prove her point, she eagerly shares another one of her many stories. While teaching at an alternative school, a group of her students thought she was “cool” because she grew up in the urban cultures of Chicago and St. Louis. But when she finally did step into the Mississippi woods for the first time, she was scared. “What’s cool is to be safe on the earth,” she said to the kids. Even though they didn’t grow up in city streets, they had other valuable gifts from growing up in a rural community. They could do things like hunt, grow food, and be comfortable in the natural world. For the first time, these black youth growing up in rural Mississippi realized that what they had was powerful.

“It’s like a bird in a cage versus a bird in a tree. There is so much more a bird can do to transform into its greatest self when it can grow in its natural environment,” she explains. “We need to return to our natural selves to get away from this social environment that has imposed so many limiting ideas about who we are.”

Chandra believes nature provides methods for change that she wants to explore through the CCAC. Many people try to change society through protests and changing legislation, but those methods often focus on problems rather than solutions. “They involve opposition, and such, we end up putting our energy into things that we don’t want rather than creating what we do want,” she says. “But there are natural ways of change that don’t require the approval or resources of an institution.”

To her, one of these natural methods of change is through art. Not only is art inspired by experiences with the natural world– whether that be the woods or city streets– it also gives power to individuals to create reality. Even though a lot of artwork today is controlled by the entertainment and music industries, individuals can create and distribute artwork freely– and with innovations like the internet, sharing art is easier now than ever before. Within a small town such as Clarksdale, the potential for sending a widespread message through artwork is even stronger.

Through the CCAC, Chandra hopes to reframe black identity by telling the history of African and African-American culture in Clarksdale. She wants to highlight the roots of the Blues, which are inspired by the descendants of the Fulani people of West Africa who, according to her, “used the Blues to sing their family trees.” She envisions a space for people to create art to reconnect to their culture by creating black American forms of art, such as bottle trees and one-string guitars. It is a program she hopes will inspire black youth in Clarksdale to connect with themselves, their gifts, and their natural environment.

Through this work, Chandra hopes that the community of Clarksdale can begin to recognize its strength as a predominately black, rural community with a deep history connected to cultures across the globe. Chandra hopes that through the CCAC, she can inspire individuals to transform into their greatest selves so that they, together, can build a stronger community. Not only can the work of the CCAC work to reinspire Clarksdale, but the message can spread to the rest of Mississippi and beyond. Through her vision and the CCAC, Chandra holds strongly onto one belief: “Mississippi can change America.”

The Fight to Survive: Sea Turtles in Costa Rica and Beyond

Tera with turtle

Courtesy of Tera

Courtesy of Tera

Courtesy of Tera

 

By Shivani Kuckreja

 COSTA RICASitting in the midst of the sprawling Las Baulas National Park, Tera Corinne Dornfeld begins to detail the many plights of sea turtles. As her turtle tattoo may suggest, Tera has devoted the past decade of her life to studying the decline of sea turtle populations. Now, from her small, dimly-lit room in the middle of Costa Rica, she shares her findings and explains why she is hopeful for the future of the species.

Just last year, it was estimated that 17%-22% of marine life caught annually by fishermen is discarded. In Costa Rica, alone, 15,000 sea turtles are killed annually by shrimpers. While the statistics seem bleak, Tera has faith that turtle excluder devices, or TEDs, can help decrease the number of turtles killed as by-catch. Rather than have fishermen unintentionally catch and suffocate sea turtles in their shrimp trawls, TEDs include areas in which sea turtles can escape the trawling nets. Citing the work of Sally Murphy, Dornfeld explains that the clunky TEDs are being remodeled to better suit thus to better appeal to the preferences of fishermen.

She also sees TEDs as an opportunity for the local Costan Rican communities to get involved. By encouraging local fishermen to join the discussion and voice their concerns and input, TEDs can be better designed for the average Costa Rican fisherman hoping to catch fish and shrimp—not turtles.

Not all sea turtle struggles can be solved by TEDs, however. It is sad to think that “after a long day of dodging fishing nets and nesting threats, leatherback turtles are still in danger when they are doing the most basic acts of all—looking for food”, Dornfeld states in despair. Drawing from her primary focus on leatherback turtles, she explains that the turtle’s only source of food is jellyfish, which is why it is so important that global communities—and, more locally, Costa Rican residents—address the littering of plastic bags, which leatherback turtles often mistake for jellyfish.

https://www.pinterest.com/pin/134334001358096177/

https://www.pinterest.com/pin/134334001358096177/

Acknowledging the impracticality and complexity of banning plastic bags, Dornfeld explains that the culture of Costa Rica is such that plastic bags are necessary, as trash and septic services in her area require all residents to dispose of trash in plastic bags. Maintaining hope, however, she sees an opportunity to ban the use of straws in restaurants around Costa Rica. Straws can get lodged in the noses of sea turtles, interfering with their breathing. After witnessing the pain inflicted on a sea turtle when a team tries to remove a straw from a turtle’s nose, Dornfeld is motivated to join forces with local Costan Rican communities to pick that battle in the coming months.

In addition to the threats that sea turtles face from plastics, Dornfeld also anticipates significant impacts on sea turtle populations as a result of climate change. The sex of sea turtles depends entirely on the temperature of the sand on which the eggs are laid. Within the next century, temperatures are expected to rise between 2.5 degrees Fahrenheit and 10 degrees Fahrenheit, and warmer temperatures yield female sea turtles. Being a tropical area, Costa Rica is especially vulnerable to the impacts of climate change. By 2050, the country’s temperatures are expected to increase by 2 degrees Celsius; by 2100, 4 degrees Celsius.

In the short-term, the number of female sea turtles are expected to rise significantly, eventually leading to a drop in overall sea turtle populations due to the absence of male sea turtles. In extreme cases of increased temperatures or decreased rain, such as what may occur in Costa Rica, many sea turtles could die.

Costa Ricans were estimated to emit only 7 million metric tons of CO2 in 2012, in comparison to the 36 gigatonnes of global emissions in 2012, but it is Costa Rican communities that will experience the severity of climate change. For the sake of under-resourced areas like Costa Rica, that have low carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions yet bear a large burden of the affects of CO2 emissions, it is imperative that countries around the world, especially developed countries, work to decrease their climate change-causing emissions, as the responsibility should not fall exclusively upon Costa Rica and similar countries.

Decreases in global CO2 emissions are imperative because Costa Rica’s economy depends heavily on tourism. Since the early 2000s, travel and ecotourism in Costa Rica has decreased, originally contributing 6.5% of Costa Rica’s GDP but declining to 4.5% of Costa Rica’s GDP by 2014. At the same time, the leatherback sea turtle population within Costa Rica has declined by over 90% since 1980, and will only further decline as climate change continues to impact our planet.

While sea turtle populations are facing incredible setbacks today, Dornfeld remains encouraged by the fact that sea turtles are an umbrella species for conservation: “When you protect sea turtles, you are protecting all other plants and animals in and around the ocean.” For starters, green sea turtles’ grazing helps maintain sea grass beds, which serve as breeding grounds for many sea creatures including fish and crustaceans. Furthermore, the unhatched sea turtles along the nesting habitat provide nutrients to dune vegetation, and stronger dune vegetation helps protect the beach from erosion.

Focusing her efforts on the powers of small-scale sea turtle conservation projects, Dornfeld looks forward to working with local communities to help ensure that sea turtles get back up on their flippers. She is also interested in learning more about how women can take time away from performing the traditional duties of a housewife to become involved in these small-scale projects. “What is possible to achieve through social science?” she asks, time and again throughout our conversation. “What needs to happen for people to drop everything and help the sea turtles?”

 

 

The New Ground Zero of Climate Change

Bridge over river with cars moving. Man on boat on river. Overcast skies over building.
Bridge over river with cars moving. Man on boat on river. Overcast skies over building.

Overcast skies over the Gulshan Banani Bridge in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Photo credit: Catherine Baltazar

Amidst the conversations regarding climate change, the usual questions that arises is: “who are the biggest contributors to climate change?” In most cases, the common responses are: the United States, India and China –countries with large populations. Other times, people connect the answer to this question with socioeconomic wealth and assume that countries with money can simply afford to shrug these problems away or place the burden on those with less. What if we were to take the question and reverse it: “who are the most impacted by the effects of climate change?” This questions will be at the heart of the beat I am proposing.

With four times as many people as California squeezed into an area the size of the state of Georgia, Bangladesh is one of the most densely populated nations on our planet with 156.6 million inhabitants. In 2013, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change released its Fifth Assessment Report, which revealed various long-term implications for Bangladesh of highly probable catastrophic events and other climate change impacts. These effects would be manifested in manny forms including sea level rise, lack of economic resources, agricultural destabilization and decreasing access to safe drinking water. For Bangladeshis, the negative effects of climate change are occurring today. Every time a natural disaster hits, the people of Bangladesh muster their strength to collect their belongings and rebuild their homes, continuing where they left off. They progress at the best of their abilities. They have become the definition of resiliency. Survival, however, becomes difficult when the effects of climate change magnify the issue at hand.

The geographical location of the country, with its many rivers and tributaries, has always made the country extremely vulnerable to natural disasters. Climate change will intensify the frequency and strength of storms, which can have a rippling effect across the country. I would like to focus my beat on further understanding the implications of these effects on various communities.

Taking Back Our Communities: Resilient Redevelopment of the US

A sustainable community imagined

Photo Credit: Bulmer Foundation

People across the United States have recognized that the development of this country has not been sustainable or just. On a national scale, the US is one of the largest producers of greenhouse gas emissions and waste. On a local scale, unequal distribution of both resources and ecological hazards causes environmental, social, and economic injustices.

But communities are responding to these injustices. Throughout the country, people are coming together to rethink and rebuild their own environments and economies. From urban community garden projects in Detroit to resilient waste-water systems in rural Appalachian towns, communities are taking the lead in the redevelopment of the US. Not only is redevelopment improving the environmental sustainability of communities, but it is also strengthening their long-term resiliency by rejuvenating social and economic dynamics.

However, these stories are not always told, as they are often led by underrepresented communities who frequently do not have a voice in national media. What are these communities doing, particularly those who aren’t often heard? How has redevelopment contributed to building social, economic, and environmental resiliency within these communities? Which projects are successful, and which are failing? These stories will serve as powerful examples as people across the country transform their communities in order to build a more just and sustainable world.

From Risk to Empowerment: Strengthening Voices, Capacities and Resilience for Those on the Frontlines of Climate Change

Impacts of Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans

Impacts of Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans

With warming temperatures, rising sea levels and more extreme weather events, the impacts of climate change are already unleashing a swath of disruptive and often catastrophic changes to many areas and communities around the world. But many populations–namely low-income, minority, the elderly and children–are especially vulnerable to climate change since they often lack adequate housing, supplies and infrastructure to effectively respond and move out of harm’s way in the case of a severe weather event. In the United States, a number of extreme weather events and disasters have overwhelmed communities, underscoring the need for states and the federal government to make smarter, long term and sustainable investments to ensure that these communities will become more resilient. In 2005 and 2012, Hurricanes Katrina and Sandy, exemplified just how the rising costs of climate change are disproportionately high for low-income and minority populations. In both communities, local, state and federal officials were largely ill prepared in the aftermath of the storms as many people struggled to receive essential supplies, housing and assistance. Similarly, along the Alaskan coast where melting sea ice, severe storms and flooding are quickly eroding the coastal lands under which many native communities live, villagers are facing imminent risk of both physical and cultural destruction despite piecemeal state and federal efforts to provide temporary solutions. While these three examples are from distinctly different regions of the U.S., they share the same lesson: cities, towns, and villages, particularly along the coast, must become more resilient to climate change. Specifically, these communities and low-income groups must not only be able to withstand physical damage after a disaster, but must also have the capacity to bounce back even stronger. With successful efforts at supporting resilience especially in these communities, the U.S. will not only save money, but will also be saving lives as well.

Over Here: The Environmental Consequences of American Militarization

Image via the National Parks Service

Rocky Mountain Arsenal in Colorado ca. 1960, photo courtesy of the National Parks Service

The environmental impact of war is often discussed in terms of the consequences of physical conflict and the deployment of weapons, but the process of preparing for war can be damaging to a country’s own environment as well. The compounds developed and stored on U.S. military bases, in depots, and in weapons development facilities can harm the people who work and live there without ever being deployed. Together, the various branches of the military are responsible for 87% of federally owned sites on the EPA’s national priorities list, which consists of contaminated sites deemed a risk to public health. The compounds involved range from jet fuel to explosives, from volatile organic compounds to heavy metals like arsenic, chromium, and lead, and even include radioactive residue. In some cases, cleanup efforts have been complicated by differences between the Department of Defense’s view of what contamination levels constitute an unnecessary risk to the public and local or federal EPA recommendations. Furthermore, because of the nature of the sites, the full extent of contamination is often only revealed to the public after the sites have been decommissioned. What happens to these bases once they are no longer useful to the military, and can their contamination ever be remediated? How can we ensure that efforts to keep the United States safe from external threats aren’t harming our domestic environment? Can a military operation ever really be considered “green”? Answering these questions will require integrating political interests, scientific data, and public health efforts in order to evaluate what national security means in the 21st century.

People Power: The Fight for Environmental Justice Continues in Southeast Los Angeles

Community members rally in front of a school near Exide in Maywood, CA.

10959254_721957131250454_1691076803780645823_o

The unexpected closure of the Exide Technologies facility in Vernon, California in March 2015 left the communities of Southeast Los Angeles with more questions than answers: What is the full extent of the Exide’s contamination given their egregious record of environmental violations? Why are governmental agencies not responding more quickly to this public health emergency? And why is there a lack of resources and funding allocated to address this environmental justice issue? Although Exide’s contamination is a local problem, the answers to these questions provide ethical, political, economic, and social implications that are transferable to other communities negatively impacted by the activities of the lead-acid battery recycling industry.

Recent news reveals that over 10,000 homes in East and Southeast Los Angeles have been contaminated with lead, arsenic, and other hazardous chemicals that are characteristic of Exide’s activities. In the process of separating parts of lead-acid batteries and melting the lead that could be reused, Exide was responsible for emitting lead and other chemicals into nearby communities. The sheer number of homes and people affected should have prompted a quick response, but the failures at the Department of Toxic Substances Control prevented such action. Although the Department earmarked $9 million to remediate about 200 homes, the thousands more homes that require remediation could cost hundreds of millions of dollars. These revelations have created outrage and distrust among community members who believe the Department continues to perpetuate environmental injustice despite the fact that it was created to protect the public’s health.

Exide’s history in Vernon is not an anomaly, but it is representative of how a politically and socially disenfranchised community continues to be marginalized even after overcoming the hurdle of closing a polluting facility. Documenting the aftermath of Exide’s closure would increase visibility of this issue and also create a historical account for future reference.

 

Just Food: A New Paradigm for Sustainable Eating

A group of white customers sit on a patch of grass in front of farmers' market tents, with a black women walking in the foreground

Most of us know a little about what eating sustainably looks like: just head to your local farmers’ market and tote your fresh, organic produce home in a reusable bag. Easy enough, right? But what else are we serving up alongside our sautéed kale and fair-trade coffee? As environmental awareness becomes more widely and visibly practiced in the American food system, what — or who — is mainstream food advocacy leaving behind?

Photo of a farmers' market showing a table of plants and customers

A bustling farmers’ market in Missoula, Montana — the future of food? (photo courtesy Wikimedia Commons)

As global climate change progresses, the challenges of feeding a rapidly growing population grow increasingly complex. From square-foot gardens to large-scale agroecosystems, sustainable agriculture opens a variety of promising pathways. Yet alternative food systems can just as easily uphold profound – and profoundly unsustainable – inequality. Urban agriculture has been called a new form of gentrification. Short-lived consumption trends among alternative foodies may disrupt cultivation, diet, and social cohesion for indigenous peoples. And we all know that making conspicuously “green” food choices means paying significantly more green. In an increasingly globalized world, how can we balance issues of scale with the need for community autonomy? How can we manage natural resources while respecting food as a vessel of heritage? And how can we ensure that food access does not come at the cost of workers’ rights and environmental quality? Such an intimate and essential act as sharing a meal carries complex implications we cannot always see — yet our approach to food also offers great opportunity for a world transformed. By complicating popular approaches to food sustainability, we can see where the cultural baggage of alternative food outweighs its benefits. More importantly, we can find and learn from movements that deliver eco-friendly food options with a side of justice.

How Do You Like Them Apples: An Exploration of the “Underside” of GM Crops

http://cdn.modernfarmer.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/apple.jpg

We’ve heard about the benefits of genetically modified crops to consumers in developing countries. We’re also aware of the ubiquity of GMOs in the American food supply, and we’re familiar with the anti-corporate and environmentalist arguments against them. Above all, we are well acquainted with the debate on GMO labeling—all news sources highlight US consumers’ great mistrust of GM crops. A recent Wall Street Journal article explained that consumers are so wary of GMOs that producers will pay to label their goods “GMO free,” even when their products – like salt – contain no genes to modify at all. This stigma, contradictory to the scientific opinion that GM crops are safe to consume, has fueled the controversy surrounding GMOs, and has stifled potential innovation. While we’ve heard about Golden Rice and increased cotton yields in India, we’ve heard little about GM products aimed toward US consumer tastes. Such technologies, like the non-browning Arctic Apple and carcinogen-free Innate Potato, would provide direct gains to US consumers and could potentially shift opinion on GM crops.

For my beat, I will highlight stories like these – exposing the “underside” of GMOs. I will synthesize GMO research from a nuanced perspective, bringing to the public’s attention potential uses for and issues with the technology. Are farmers in the US following proper protocol to keep environmental problems surrounding GMOs at bay? Could GMOs be used to grow more food in the face of drought in California? Lesser explored questions like these are crucial to problems facing our future food supply, and providing consumers with balanced information is our best strategy for finding solutions.

The Vilest Green: How Excess Phosphorus Ruins Our Water

by Rebecca Matteson

Water on the Potomac river is green with algae. Image courtesy of wikimedia commons.  https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/36/Potomac_green_water.JPG

Eutrophication on the Potomac river Photo credit: Alexandr Trubetskoy

Phosphorous, a component of DNA, is essential to life on earth. However, humanity is quickly turning it into an example of what happens when you have too much of a good thing. In nature, phosphorous is cycled relatively quickly in biological systems (plants take it up from the soil, animals eat plants, excrete the phosphorus back into the soil, and so on) while on the geological level phosphorus moves slowly, entering biological systems as phosphorus-containing rocks weather. Now, however, phosphorus enters biological systems more quickly, since humans mine phosphorus from rocks in vast quantities and use it in detergents and fertilizers. Since the 1940s, the worldwide production of phosphate rock has increased by 140 million metric tonnes. While the EU has banned phosphorus-based detergent and parts of the USA have placed regulations on cleaning agent phosphate content[3] other sources of phosphorus, including agricultural runoff can cause problems as the nutrients gather in bodies of water. A 2012 summary showed that 45% of tested rivers and 76% of the tested lakes in England did not comply with phosphorus standards, though the full extent of the problem is still unknown. These excess nutrients can cause algae blooms that can deplete oxygen, limit biodiversity, and cause dead zones in a process called eutrophication. Once this eutrophication begins, it can be hard to correct, since aquatic systems recycle nutrients and even without new inputs, the phosphorus that is already there continues to impact the system. Nutrient runoff also hurts the quality of drinking water and makes bodies of water less suitable for recreational use. In addition, researchers predict that we could reach peak phosphorus before 2040, a disastrous proposition considering our current dependence on this resource. I would like to spend this semester exploring the problem of eutrophication and finding alternatives to our current unsustainable use of phosphorus.