Image from http://google.com
Dear Google
If it is not already apparent to you, I live and breathe your tools. I own a beautiful Google Nexus 6P phone, whose battery life continues to amaze me. I use GMail, Inbox, Drive, Calendar, Keep, Google+, YouTube, Photos, Maps, you name them, and I use them. It is moot to point out that I use Google search, because, how else does one live anymore? I marvel at all the things you have done and you continue to do, manage to give so much of it away for free, yet manage to make boat loads of money. But, please, can you take care of a few very simple, but very important things first?
(more…)
Taken from:
http://goo.gl/XXmJGc%5B/caption%5D
I was at a meeting in Washington DC organized by CLIR. CIOs from liberal arts colleges with merged Library/IT organizations are members of CLIR and meet twice a year. This time around, we included senior managers from each of our institutions also. One of the topics we discussed was “Sharing and Collaboration”.
As I have written before, collaboration is very hard and the types of collaborations we take pride in and celebrate are the so-called “low hanging fruits”. The real ones we have been discussing for long time, such as sharing services and staff simply remains unattainable. So, I thought I will share with you my analysis of factors that contribute to a successful collaboration.
(more…)
It is no secret that the use of the libraries has undergone drastic changes and numerous articles have been written on this subject. There are several valuable resources available for understanding the trends and the future of the libraries. I would like to link to a few here that are directly relevant to what I would like to discuss.
Ithaka S+R US Library Survey 2013 executive summary (the last available survey from them) summarizes some of the key findings on collections:
- A minority of respondents, even at doctoral institutions, believes that purchasing
print books to build research collections is important, while the large
majority believes that building local print collections has declined in importance.
By comparison, the vast majority of respondents see resource sharing
as an important library function and there is ample evidence across institutional
types of the importance of collaborative approaches to serving users’
information needs.
- For journals, the shift from print to electronic collecting has been, from a
budget allocation perspective, nearly completed. Library directors tend to
be more comfortable than are faculty members with the print to electronic
transition for scholarly journals.
- A possible format shift from print books to ebooks appears to be occurring
at a more measured pace, with relatively small projected increases in ebook
spending. Views about the importance of ebooks in their libraries have not
measurably changed over the past three years. With respect to books, library
directors may if anything be less aggressive in moving towards electronic
formats than are faculty members.
Drafting a viable plan for managing the library collections as well as the efficient use of library spaces to meet the emerging needs of the students and faculty are activities that we are engaged in. These are extremely difficult topics on which there are differing views, but this statement generally applies to anything we do in library and technology services! What is important is to have broad, and informed conversations, take into consideration multiple dimensions of the issues and come to a sensible conclusion. Yup, easier said than done, but we are making progress…
(more…)
If you follow me on twitter you must have seen my tweets from the edX global forum in Washington DC from 8th Nov till the 10th. As an early adopter of MOOC, we have been extremely happy with our decision to get into MOOCs as well as with the success of our MOOCs. Measure of success is clearly in the eyes of the beholder. Those who are non-believers will point to the very poor completion rates (compared to the initial registration). Those of us who believe that MOOCs have a place in Higher Education will point to a whole list of other things – those who complete our MOOCs are still several multiples of face to face class size, our faculty are engaging with the global audience to help them learn the “liberal arts” way, they are learning from teaching in a new platform to a global audience for the benefit of the students in face to face classes, our students say that the MOOCs help them as a valuable additional resource to their face to face class etc. We are not going to settle this debate any time soon, so let us move on.
I thoroughly enjoyed the meeting. The presentations and panels were impressive. The networking was excellent. I got to meet a lot of people from Europe, some from Jordan, a few from Japan. I was fascinated to meet a young man from Sri Lanka who supports MOOCs from Kyoto University. Of course, he does not speak Japanese and I found out that he is a vegetarian. Talk about an outlier! It is also fair to say that he would be one of the rare Sinhalese Vegetarian.
(more…)
We just finished & submitted the EDUCAUSE Core Data Survey and I thought this is a better forum to discuss than the narrow discussion in EDUCAUSE CIO Listserve. Today is the deadline and we finished it.
First off, what I say below hopefully will help improve the survey and bring more clarity to us as those providing input as well as benefiting from such an important dataset. As a CIO I totally get it that the users are not shy when things don’t work and are deeply silent when things do work. In this case, I am a user! And a dedicated one in that we have submitted the surveys every year that I can remember though to be honest, its value is diminishing for reasons that I will touch on below. Dedication also comes from a deep rooted fear that not filling out the survey will result in us being kicked out of Consortium of Liberal Arts Colleges (CLAC) (Filling out Module 1 is a membership requirement). CLAC membership is one that I treasure tremendously!
(more…)
I was in Indianapolis attending EDUCAUSE Annual Conference last week. It was a reasonably good conference. Every year I come back and say to myself that I am going to seriously look into whether to go next year or not. I say the same this year. The conference has grown tremendously and the leadership was proud about 7000 attendees. Reminded me about admissions officers being proud of the number of applications. As always, the best part of the conference was meeting some of the colleagues. Some of the presentations I attended were interesting and so were the general sessions. This time, I also enjoyed meeting a couple of senior folks from companies with whom we either have a relationship or plan to.
I would have expected the programming to be a bit more interesting and diverse given the number of attendees. When I heard at least a couple were presenting twice, I was a bit surprised. Panels are great, but when most of the events are panels, where each presenter gets between 5 and 7 minutes to present and everyone is trying to be nice to the other presenters and therefore trying to keep to their time, it gets a bit restrictive. Now, on to the subject of my blog.
(more…)
I am in Indianapolis attending the EDUCAUSE Annual conference. You can see my tweets from the conference. We had an early start at 8 AM to listen to the first keynote by Daniel Pink titled “The Cascade Effect: How Small Wins Can Transform Your Organization”. It was interesting and there were a few good take home lessons. The talk was mostly about motivating the staff in your organization. He referred to a collection of social science research in his talk the conclusions from which can be summarized as “If the work involves even rudimentary cognitive tasks, then better rewards by themselves don’t improve performance”.
Some of the recipes provided were useful, such as constant feedback, providing autonomy etc. One thing he mentioned was to give the staff an hour a week for them to explore new things. As you see in one of my tweets, I am very happy to say that we already have this in place in LTS at Wellesley where we encourage the staff to take 2 hours a week to explore new areas. He stressed the importance of weekly meetings where feedback is provided, but change every fourth such meeting to talk about something totally different, such as career ambitions etc.
I also attended a couple of other talks, one on digital scholarship and another abut “what’s next in higher education”, both were a bit disappointing. However, during a dinner last night I was talking to a few colleagues from other institutions and what caught my attention was how many times the “What if?” question came up.
(more…)
“Data governance (DG) refers to the overall management of the availability, usability, integrity, and security of the data employed in an enterprise. A sound data governance program includes a governing body or council, a defined set of procedures, and a plan to execute those procedures.” This operational definition, by Margaret Rouse, captures what data governance is all about. I think it is fair to say that in most of Higher Ed, access to data is far less than optimal. The reasons for this are varied.
In “Choosing Governance Models” , Gwen Thomas outlines some of the important things to consider when it comes to data governance.
- Top-down
- Bottom-up
- Center-out, or
- Silo-in
This will provide a window into why access to reliable data in a secure way is a huge issue in higher ed. First and foremost, until recently we have not had any formal governance structures. In many cases, it has been bottom up, decisions were taken in data silos and no one was willing to disturb the status quo. These have resulted in incoherent policies, over control of data and in some cases misinterpretation of the laws governing data. In general there are a lot of users in the institution complaining about problems and not many who are interested in participating in finding a solution.
(more…)
Earlier this year, EDUCAUSE published Top 10 issues facing technology organizations. In an opinion piece, Steven Bell, Associate University Librarian at Temple University, posted a similar list for the Libraries “Top 10 Academic Library Issues for 2015 | From the Bell Tower“. These lists provide us a way to look at what we do and gauge how we are doing. Sometimes, it is pretty heartening to see that we are not the only ones facing these issues and other times you are glad that these are no longer “issues” for you.
It is not my intent to go over them one at a time, rather just highlight some of them.
(more…)
Data integration is a fact of life for those of us who are in the information technology business. Since we are yet to invent a single system that does everything for everyone in an enterprise, it is inevitable that we have to support and deal with multiple systems. It is equally true that unless the data from these diverse systems are integrated, we will not be able to understand the data in a coherent fashion. With the proliferation of “best of breed” solutions we have a complicated mess in hand.
Most institutions have a large administrative system like Banner or PeopleSoft that is considered to hold the authoritative data. In addition, for the purpose of reporting, we all have a data warehouse or a data mart into which data from the central systems is inserted typically on a nightly basis. The general premise of this is that the administrative systems were originally designed to take in the transactional data and therefore optimized for that purpose. They were not designed for complex reporting. Combining both of these in one system means a drain in resources and everyone suffers. Modern systems like Workday claims to have designed their system in ways that you can do all activities in one system. When you have multiple systems, generally, the data is integrated with the administrative systems, though in some cases, directly into the data warehouse.
(more…)